Readers take the initiative on measures

Re “Here we go again,” editorial, Oct. 9

The Times is correct in saying that the issues raised in the eight ballot measures to be voted on in November should have been taken up by the Legislature. But they weren’t, and that is exactly the kind of problem the initiative process is designed to fix. Take, for example, the initiative to put the redistricting process in the hands of an independent commission. In 2001, the Legislature gerrymandered the voting districts in a way that makes it impossible for the voters to take away the incumbents’ cushy jobs. Does anyone think our legislators would be suddenly overcome by a desire to allow Californians to have fair elections and voluntarily give up the power to draw districts in their own interest? Ridiculous! When the Legislature refuses to act, the people can and must act.

GEORGE L. CLARK SR.

Manhattan Beach

*

I don’t like the way we are going under Arnold Schwarzenegger. He failed to develop a program that appeals to the majority of Californians. The best that he can do is sponsor some initiatives. I prefer that the governor and the Legislature debate these issues so that we as citizens have full exposure to all sides. Instead, I must endure the political blabber of the opposing sides who hope that gobs of money will sway me. Therefore, I intend to vote in the election against every proposition to send a message to those who abuse the initiative system that this is no way to run a government.

DON WICKERT

La Verne

*

I just received my ballot for the November election. The only proposition I am interested in voting an enthusiastic “yes” on -- recall of our governor -- is missing, unfortunately.

ISABELLE H. MEYER

Glendale