Agony and attitudes at the airport

SORRY to hear Mary McNamara had a hard time with airport security overseas [“Ah, Paris -- the Romance, the Food, the Airport, the Agony,” Kids on Board, Feb. 11]. We travel extensively with our four children under 4 years old, and our experience has been mostly the opposite.

Foreign airports are usually far more accommodating for families than any in the U.S. We often experience preferential treatment, special fast-track security lines, passport lanes, early boarding.

It’s not only more civilized but saves the sanity for all the flying public, big and small.

I suppose Gallic gallantness does not extend to Charles de Gaulle International Airport.

KENDALL CREIGHTON

Los Angeles

*

McNAMARA’s problem of entering and exiting the U.S. was not due to the security. It was due to her attitude. It seems that she expected care from people who have a job to do and that job is not taking care of you, or of “a family with small children,” but of your security.

You say “we wonder whether we dare set foot....” Don’t “dare to set foot.” Simply grow up and change your perception and you will see how the journey works as a cooperative effort, family style.

And enjoy the destination. My two grandsons, who are 9 and 10 years old, fly frequently with their parents -- and even by themselves.

JOAN LONON

Pasadena

*

I found your airport piece especially interesting in light of my sister’s recent explanation of why she and her husband don’t plan to revisit the U.S. (they live in Britain) any time soon.

The reason, she says, is that U.S. security and immigration personnel in general have developed a reputation among recently returning British tourists as being downright unfriendly, unpleasant and humorless.

“You used to be able to joke around with them and feel welcome,” she says.

Not anymore.

ANNETTE WINTER

Santa Barbara