Employers and worker advocates both hate Trump’s plan to overhaul labor watchdogs
Businesses and advocates for workers are forming a rare alliance against President Trump’s proposal to overhaul the way the government investigates workplace discrimination, part of what his critics say is a broader swipe at decades of civil rights protections.
Trump wants to merge the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission with a lesser-known agency that also enforces laws on equality in the workplace. The EEOC is an independent agency that investigates discrimination complaints against private businesses. The second agency — the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs — polices discrimination among federal contractors. The administration contends that combining the two would reduce duplication by offering “one door” for workers to bring discrimination complaints.
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, the only Latino in Trump’s Cabinet, is expected to be asked about the proposal Wednesday when he appears at a House hearing on the agency’s budget.
Employers’ allies, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, fear the proposal would create something of a super enforcement agency with overwhelming investigatory and punitive powers.
“If you take these two agencies and put them together, the concern is you’d have a perfect storm, a nightmare scenario for employers,” said Mickey Silberman, who defends employers and contractors in government investigations for the law firm Jackson Lewis P.C. in Denver.
But workers’ rights organizations predict the opposite would happen, viewing Trump’s new combined agency as a way to make enforcement so onerous it happens less effectively.
“We’d be going backward in terms of enforcement, which honestly I believe is the intention,” said Paula Brantner, an employment lawyer and senior advisor to the Workplace Fairness advocacy group.
In 2012, while he was dean at the Florida International University law school, Acosta — whose parents are Cuban immigrants — staked out a position starkly different from Trump’s on immigrants who are in the country illegally. “We need them here. They provide construction jobs. They provide agricultural jobs,” said Acosta, who previously served as head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division.
The National Women’s Law Center’s Emily Martin said she hoped that Acosta would continue to emphasize the importance of civil rights protections for low-wage workers and workers of color, but added, “certainly the budget that he will be defending does not clearly speak to that.”
Armed with subpoena power, the EEOC resolved more than 97,000 cases in fiscal year 2016 and took in nearly 92,000 new ones. The budget document says the number of new cases probably would drop slightly. The backlog of unresolved cases also is expected to gradually decline, to 60,000 cases in fiscal year 2020 from more than 73,000.
The second agency, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, is part of the Labor Department. The budget proposes reducing staff to 440 employees from 571 and merging it with the EEOC, for a saving of just over $17 million.
Advocates for racial, gender and sexual equality say that Trump’s budget is rife with examples supporting their suspicions about a reduced government role enforcing civil rights.
The budget would eliminate at least 10% of key civil rights enforcement positions across the government, advocates estimate.
In addition to cuts at the Labor Department, Trump has proposed cutting posts at the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights and the Legal Services Corp., which helped more than 2 million low-income individuals with legal representation last year, advocates said. Additionally, Trump proposes deleting the Environmental Protection Agency’s environmental justice program, which addresses environmental and health concerns in minority, low-income and tribal communities. The administration says such concerns would be addressed by other parts of the EPA.
The budget presents them all as cost-cutting measures.
Republicans have long assailed the EEOC for inefficiencies, particularly its backlog.
“These are men and women who turned to the federal government for help and got lost in an inefficient bureaucracy,” Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Ala.), the chairman of the subcommittee on workforce protections, said during a May 23 hearing.
Your guide to our new economic reality.
Get our free business newsletter for insights and tips for getting by.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.