Investors press Exxon Mobil to disclose how climate-change policies affect it
Exxon Mobil Corp. shareholders pushed the company Wednesday to share more information about whether regulations designed to reduce climate change will hurt the oil giant’s business.
Investors holding 62% of shares voted at the company’s annual meeting in favor of more disclosure around the effect of global policies aimed at limiting global warming to 2 degrees centigrade. The vote is a defeat for Exxon Mobil and a victory for environmentalists and shareholder activists, who saw support for their proposal grow from 38% a year ago.
Chairman and Chief Executive Darren Woods said the matter will be reconsidered by the Exxon board.
The climate-change resolution was submitted by the New York state retirement fund. It asked the company to analyze the effects on Exxon’s oil and gas reserves and resources in case demand for fossil fuels drops because of climate-change policies.
Edward Mason, an official with the Church of England’s endowment and a former British diplomat, said Exxon Mobil had refused to increase meaningful disclosure of its vulnerability to climate-related regulation in the face of scientific consensus about the severity of the problem.
Addressing some Exxon directors by name, Mason said, “Members of the board, do you leave your understanding of climate change at the door when you attend Exxon board meetings?”
“Our outlook assumes increasingly stringent climate policy,” Woods said. “At the same time, it assumes growing energy demand through 2040 including substantial demand for oil and gas. We are confident in the commercial viability of our portfolio.”
Exxon Mobil did not disclose the votes of individual shareholders, but both sides had targeted major institutional investors including BlackRock, Vanguard and Fidelity.
Shareholders rejected a separate resolution backed by the environmentally minded. That one asked Exxon to describe steps it takes to prevent methane emissions from hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, during well drilling. The measure got about 39% support.
Wednesday’s meeting was the first since Woods became CEO. Woods succeeded Rex Tillerson, who moved up his retirement date after being picked to become President Trump’s secretary of State.
Tillerson set a different tone at Exxon by endorsing a carbon tax, supporting the Paris climate agreement and calling climate change a serious risk. But environmentalists attack Exxon for funding groups that try to discredit and dismiss climate science, and New York and Massachusetts officials are investigating whether ExxonMobil misled investors about the risks the company faces from tougher regulation of carbon emissions.
Low crude prices have taken a toll on Exxon profit, which fell from $32.5 billion in 2014 to $16.2 billion in 2015 to $7.8 billion in 2016. With cash declining and debt rising, Exxon lost its sterling AAA credit rating last year.
Shares of Irving, Texas-based Exxon Mobil rose 16% in 2016 but have dropped nearly 10% since the start of this year. On Wednesday, the shares fell 0.7% to $80.50.
2:25 p.m. This article was updated with Exxon Mobil’s closing stock price.
It was originally published at 11:30 a.m.
Your guide to our clean energy future
Get our Boiling Point newsletter for the latest on the power sector, water wars and more — and what they mean for California.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.