WeWork keeps pushing. Now landlords and rivals are pushing back
WeWork Cos. is increasingly stepping on landlords’ and real estate brokers’ turf — and the industry is starting to push back.
The office-sharing giant, valued at as much as $42 billion, is getting a greater portion of its business from the large companies that property owners usually court. It’s also building an investment division to buy its own sites, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
At the same time, big real estate names such as Blackstone Group and Tishman Speyer are venturing into flexible-space offerings of their own. Brokers, meanwhile, are growing wary that WeWork is cutting them out of deals.
WeWork’s widening ambitions threaten to further upend the industry it has already reshaped in its eight-year existence. Few in the property business are willing to talk openly about the company, given its clout. Privately, more than a dozen real estate and banking executives interviewed by Bloomberg expressed misgivings about working with the closely held startup. The question is whether WeWork can keep up its breakneck expansion — and its lofty valuation — if friction grows.
“By participating in virtually all the elements of the real estate food chain, WeWork will find themselves in deeply competitive situations with others,” said Cedrik Lachance, director of research on real estate investment trusts at Green Street Advisors. “It may limit their ability to have access to some buildings.”
Backed by Japan’s SoftBank Group Corp., New York-based WeWork has built itself into one of the world’s most valuable startups through a global leasing spree. It had more than 300 locations in 83 cities as of the third quarter, and it says it’s the biggest private office user in Manhattan, London and Washington, D.C. In many ways, it has been a boon to the real estate industry by helping landlords fill spaces and generating big fees for brokers.
The company started out taking 10- or 15-year leases, redesigning the interiors and renting individual desks or small offices to startups. But in recent years, WeWork has expanded to much larger customers: More than 30% of its members now work at companies with 1,000 or more employees. It designs and operates entire multifloor offices for its biggest users as part of its enterprise business, blurring the line between itself and traditional landlords.
“A lot of people originally thought of the shared-office-space providers as bringing tenants,” said Tony Malkin, chief executive of Empire State Realty Trust Inc., which owns New York’s Empire State Building. “But I think now we’ve seen — particularly with WeWork and other providers’ expansion into the enterprise solution — that it’s really much more about disrupting the relationship of tenants to landlords, of tenants to brokers, of brokers to landlords.”
WeWork has dipped its toe into real estate ownership through deals such as purchasing Manhattan’s Lord & Taylor building with private equity firm Rhone Group. Now it’s delving further into property buying. The company is raising a separate real estate investment fund, called ARK, for acquisitions, said the people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named because WeWork hasn’t publicized the effort.
The company tapped Wendy Silverstein, the former head of landlord New York REIT, as chief investment officer, as reported last month by the Real Deal. It has hired at least four real estate acquisitions veterans since May.
WeWork declined to comment on ARK or Silverstein. Granit Gjonbalaj, the company’s chief development officer, said the hires are part of an effort to diversify WeWork’s coworking spaces beyond its usual long-term leases. He said WeWork brings value to buildings by filling them faster, and it wants to capture some of that upside.
WeWork woos brokers with big commissions to bring in tenants — but it’s also starting to compete. As part of its new Space Services program, the company will take small and mid-size businesses that were interested in WeWork but couldn’t find the right match and refer them to landlords, collecting a fee.
“I don’t think of it as a broker service,” said Gjonbalaj. “It’s: How can we add value to potential members coming and inquiring about coming onto the WeWork platform but who are, for whatever reason, unable to do so?”
WeWork has angered brokers by going around them for deals, said people at two large brokerages, who asked not to be named because WeWork is a client. Others in the industry have balked at leasing to the company or lending on properties where it is a major tenant, based on its credit risk, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
There’s also concern about what happens if the economy turns. WeWork forms a subsidiary to represent each lease deal, which means individual locations could fold without passing along much risk to the parent company. WeWork only guarantees the lease for about six to 12 months on a 15-year agreement, according to documents associated with the company’s inaugural bond offering.
“If you’re going to commit your space for a term of 10 years, you want to make sure that your tenant is creditworthy and they’re gonna be there tomorrow, the next year and the year after that,” said Michael Emory, chief executive of Canadian office owner Allied Properties REIT, which won’t lease space to WeWork.
Wall Street investors are cautious on WeWork as well: The company’s bonds have struggled since they were issued in April. The $702 million of 7.875% notes dropped below par almost immediately after the sale and now trade at 92.75 cents on the dollar, according to Trace, the bond price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
WeWork says it’s a partner to landlords in helping to improve buildings, and it argues that its presence can increase property values and rents.
The company has many fans in the real estate industry, and it has a big backer in SoftBank, its largest investor. Last month, SoftBank signed a $3-billion warrant to buy more shares in a deal that would value WeWork at at least $42 billion — more than double the value of any publicly traded U.S. office landlord.
And WeWork is having no problem leasing space. As of June, it was adding 500,000 to 1 million square feet of new space globally each month, according to CB Insights.
“They’re a good tenant — tough and exacting on their lease and space requirements, but they generally improve the image people have of a building,” said Sonny Kalsi, a founder and partner of GreenOak Real Estate, which leases to WeWork at properties in New York and Tokyo.
The biggest risk to WeWork may be large, experienced real estate companies jumping in to compete. In October, brokerage CBRE Group Inc. launched a business called Hana that will help landlords create their own flexible offices.
Owners want to be a part of the rising demand for that type of space, said Andrew Kupiec, Hana’s chief executive. They want it “done in a way that they’re put in control and they have transparency,” he said.
Hana will operate separately from CBRE’s brokerage business, where WeWork is a client.
In September, Tishman Speyer started a coworking business called Studio, bringing flex space to properties such as New York’s Rockefeller Center. Landlords, including Silverstein Properties and Land Securities, have also made forays into the area.
Blackstone and Brookfield Property Partners, meanwhile, have leased to WeWork but have partnered with coworking providers such as Industrious and Convene to manage flexible offices in their buildings. In the United States, WeWork traditionally leases space from landlords and keeps the upside if things go well, but rivals often structure their deals as management contracts, splitting profits with the landlord.
WeWork’s Gjonbalaj said the company is also pursuing more management agreements in the United States. As of October, it was in talks for as many as 30 over the previous month. In an interview with Bisnow last month, Gjonbalaj said he’s unconcerned by entrants such as Tishman and CBRE, saying more companies in the area help solidify flexible space as an asset class.
So far, Empire State’s Malkin has refused to lease space to WeWork and is leery of other coworking companies. Property owners that may have lowered leasing standards or offered incentives to attract shared-office providers have been “shortsighted and lazy,” he said.
“Landlords deserve the blame for whatever happens with WeWork,” he said. “Because they let it happen — they made it happen. They’ve enabled the business.”
Wong, Huet and Sidders write for Bloomberg.
The view from Sacramento
Sign up for the California Politics newsletter to get exclusive analysis from our reporters.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.