Advertisement

Errors cited in Lap-Band operation

Share

A surgeon cut an Orange County woman’s aorta during Lap-Band weight-loss surgery in 2011 and an anesthesiologist failed to detect her hemorrhaging, events that led to her death, according to a Los Angeles County Coroner’s autopsy report.

The report found that the injury and the failure to respond adequately during laparoscopic surgery at Valley Surgical Center in West Hills constituted “an extreme deviation from the standard of care” on the part of the doctors.

Shortly after surgery, Paula Rojeski, 55, of Ladera Ranch went into cardiac arrest and was rushed to a hospital, where she was pronounced dead.

Advertisement

The autopsy report, by medical examiners Dr. Adrian Marinovich and Dr. Raffi Djabourian, determined that the aorta likely was cut early in the 30-minute surgery, “indicating that prompt recognition of the problem may have prevented this death.”

The report, obtained by The Times this week, noted that Rojeski had heart disease, which the medical examiners said was a “contributing factor.” However, they said, “but for the surgical injury, the heart would not have given out when it did.”

Neither of the doctors involved — Dr. Julius Gee, the surgeon, and Dr. Deming Chau, the anesthesiologist — could be reached for comment.

Rojeski was the last of five people who died from 2009 through 2011 after Lap-Band surgery at clinics affiliated with the now-defunct 1-800-GET-THIN marketing operation, according to lawsuits, autopsy reports and other public records.

The GET-THIN advertisements blanketed Southern California roadside billboards, radio, television and the Internet for more than two years.

The autopsy report cited the conclusion of Dr. Denis Astarita, a surgeon consulted by the coroner’s office, that Gee’s “gross negligence with incompetence had a role in this death.”

Advertisement

A coroner’s anesthesiology consultant said in a report attached to the autopsy that Chau “did not meet the standard of care” for a physician because “he failed to identify the problem and inform the surgeon of the patient’s deterioration.”

“This was a salvageable injury.… If the surgeon is alerted, repair is possible,” said the consultant, Dr. Selma Calmes. “Part of an anesthesiologist’s job is to inform the surgeon that a patient appears to be losing blood inside the abdomen.”

On March 29, Valley Surgical Center sued the coroner’s office in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, seeking to block release of the autopsy report and have the coroner’s office removed from the case. The lawsuit also seeks unspecified monetary damages for alleged violations of constitutional rights.

The lawsuit said the autopsy report was “seriously flawed” and that Calmes, the anesthesiology consultant, was biased against outpatient surgery centers.

It also said that Calmes’ initial report erroneously criticized the anesthesiologist for cutting off anesthesiology 30 minutes into a two-hour surgery when the surgery itself lasted only 30 minutes. Calmes corrected the mistake in a supplemental report after the surgery center brought it to her attention.

“Far from being an impartial investigative body seeking the truth, the coroner has demonstrated a clear bias against Valley, which disqualifies it from continuing to investigate the Rojeski death,” the surgery center said in the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Valley Surgical produced reports from seven independent consultants who said the coroner’s report was flawed. Some of the reports said Rojeski’s aorta may have been cut by paramedics performing CPR.

“We believe that we will be able to prove that the conduct of the investigation was premised on false information, continues to be premised on false information, was biased and was conducted with a reckless disregard for the truth and Valley’s rights,” the surgery center’s attorney, Barry Litt, said in an email to The Times.

Craig Harvey, chief of operations for the coroner, and Kenneth Maranga, an attorney representing the coroner, declined to comment.

Former employees of surgery centers affiliated with 1-800-GET-THIN alleged in a whistle-blower lawsuit last year that the marketing company put profits ahead of patient safety, hiring unqualified surgeons and failing to maintain sanitary conditions at the surgery centers.

The lawsuit said 1-800-GET-THIN and the surgery centers were operated by two brothers, Michael and Julian Omidi. The lawsuit was settled out of court and terms were not disclosed, according to court records.

In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration sent 1-800-GET-THIN, Valley Surgical Center and other affiliated outpatient clinics a warning that the ads violated federal law because they did not include adequate warnings about the risks of weight-loss surgery.

Advertisement

The company pulled the advertising last year.

Marni Rader, a friend of Rojeski, said she was upset to learn about the coroner’s findings. She said she hoped the Medical Board of California would discipline the doctors involved.

“I don’t want them to ever perform medical procedures on another person, period,” Rader said. “They should absolutely have their licenses revoked.... This company has put money before human lives. It’s unbelievable.”

Astarita, the coroner’s surgical consultant, suggested in his report attached to the autopsy that the coroner forward its findings to the state’s medical licensing and disciplinary bodies.

Gee is licensed by the Osteopathic Medical Board of California; Chau by the Medical Board of California.

An official with the osteopathic board did not respond to a request for comment.

Cassandra Hockenson, a spokeswoman for the medical board, declined to say whether Chau was under investigation. “By law, the coroner must inform us of his findings,” Hockenson said in an email.

Valley Surgical’s lawsuit also alleged that Rojeski failed to notify the medical staff that she suffered from pre-existing heart disease, a condition that would have made her an unsuitable candidate for surgery.

Advertisement

The surgery center said that Rojeski had previously outlined her heart condition in a lawsuit she filed in 2003 over damage from taking the weight-loss drug commonly called Fen-Phen, which was settled.

“With her weakened heart from the prior Fen-Phen usage, Ms. Rojeski was not a good candidate for laparoscopic surgery because she had a compromised heart and could not sustain events during surgery which would not have affected a healthy patient,” the lawsuit alleged.

The Los Angeles Police Department’s robbery-homicide division opened an investigation last year into Rojeski’s death. A department official said this week that the investigation is still open.

Police had requested that the coroner not release the autopsy report during the investigation but lifted that hold at the end of December, the coroner’s office said in court papers in the Valley Surgical lawsuit.

stuart.pfeifer@latimes.com

Times staff writer Andrew Blankstein contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Advertisement