Advertisement
Business

Tesla’s Autopilot found partly to blame for 2018 crash on the 405

Tesla crash
A Tesla rear-ended a fire truck that was parked because it was responding to an accident on the 405 Freeway in Culver City on Jan. 22, 2018.
(Culver City Firefighters Local 1927)

U.S. transportation safety investigators found Tesla Inc.’s design of its automated driver-assist system was partly to blame for a crash in which an inattentive driver slammed into a fire truck parked on the 405 Freeway near Los Angeles in 2018.

The National Transportation Safety Board also cited the driver’s failure to stop for the truck, which was parked with its emergency lights on, in the Jan. 22, 2018, collision, which caused no injuries. The driver’s actions were “due to inattention and overreliance on the vehicle’s advanced driver assistance system,” the NTSB said in a final report released Wednesday.

The vehicle’s design “permitted the driver to disengage from the driving task” the agency said, adding that the driver was using the system “in ways inconsistent with guidance and warnings from the manufacturer.”

APphoto_Tesla Crash Investigation
March 23, 2018 photo provided by KTVU, emergency personnel work a the scene where a Tesla electric SUV crashed into a barrier on U.S. Highway 101 in Mountain View, Calif. The NTSB probe into this Tesla crashe involving the Autopilot system is still pending.
(Associated Press)

The findings are the latest to put the coming wave of automated driving machines under a microscope over doubts about their safety and how they interact with the humans behind the wheel. In 2017, the agency cited the Tesla system’s design as a contributor to a fatal 2016 crash in Florida, prompting two recommendations to the company and other manufacturers to improve the safety of partially autonomous driving tools.

Advertisement

Tesla defended its Autopilot suite of automation systems and said it has adjusted the time intervals between warnings the car gives drivers whose hands aren’t detected on the steering wheel.

“Tesla owners have driven billions of miles with Autopilot engaged, and data from our quarterly Vehicle Safety Report indicates that drivers using Autopilot remain safer than those operating without assistance,” the company said in an emailed statement. “While our driver-monitoring system for Autopilot repeatedly reminds drivers of their responsibility to remain attentive and prohibits the use of Autopilot when warnings are ignored.”

In the January 2018 incident, the Tesla driver had been traveling in a left-hand carpool lane on the 405 Freeway in Culver City behind a large SUV or pickup, according to NTSB records. That vehicle changed lanes just before reaching the fire truck and a Highway Patrol car, which had stopped in response to a previous accident and were each flashing their emergency lights.

Advertisement

When the other vehicle changed lanes, the Tesla sped up and hit the truck at a speed of 31 mph, NTSB said.

The Tesla driver said he was looking forward but was unable to see the fire truck with enough time to avoid the crash, according to the NTSB.

An eyewitness, however, told investigators and police that the Tesla driver had been looking down at what appeared to be a mobile device moments before rear-ending the fire truck. The NTSB found no indication that the Tesla driver had been texting or making a call at the time but couldn’t determine whether the phone was being used for other purposes.

The Tesla driver, a 47-year-old man who was driving to work, had bought the car used about six months earlier. He said he purchased it partly as a result of its Autopilot feature, which helps with some braking and acceleration functions as well as steering.

He said he obtained a manual for the car but hadn’t read it. A salesman at a Tesla dealership instructed him on how to use Autopilot.

The owner’s manual contains numerous warnings about the car’s ability to automatically follow traffic. It is “not a collision warning or avoidance system,” the manual said in one section. It also said drivers should “never” depend on it to slow down the car.

Out of the final 13 minutes and 48 seconds prior to the crash, the driver’s hands were detected on the steering wheel for 51 seconds, according to NTSB.

Advertisement

The car issued a visual alert telling the driver to put his hands on the wheel four times and sounded an audible warning once during that time. His hands weren’t detected on the wheel for the final 3 minutes and 41 seconds, according to the report.

The NTSB in 2017 cited Tesla’s design of Autopilot as a contributing factor in a 2016 fatal crash in Florida. In that accident, the car essentially drove itself into the side of a truck that its sensors didn’t detect. The Tesla driver died.

“The system gave far too much leeway to the driver to divert his attention to something other than driving,” NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt said at the time.

In that report two years ago, the NTSB issued multiple recommendations to industry and government to tighten restrictions on how such automation systems can be used to push drivers to pay better attention.

The recommendation to other car manufacturers with similar systems is classified as “Open-Acceptable.” Because Tesla has never responded, the safety board has classified the recommendation to the car company as “Open-Awaiting Response.”

Still pending are NTSB probes of other Tesla crashes involving the Autopilot system, including a March 2018 fatal collision in Mountain View, Calif., and another last March in Delray Beach, Fla. The safety board is also examining the risks of the electric car’s lithium-ion batteries, which have burned after several accidents and are difficult to extinguish.


Newsletter
Get our weekly California Inc. newsletter
Advertisement