Advertisement

It’s 2023. What will become of these Hollywood trends and habits in the new year?

A Golden Globe statue with a notepad and crumpled paper in the background
(Photo illustration by Nicole Vas / Los Angeles Times; Chris Pizzello / Associated Press; Unsplash)
Share

Welcome to the Wide Shot, a newsletter about the business of entertainment. Sign up here to get it in your inbox.

We made it, everyone. It’s the first Wide Shot newsletter of 2023. Last week was very slow, unless you were WWE majority owner Vince McMahon, who is staging a return to the company after a scandal in order to pursue a sale (possibly to Comcast?).

The Globes are back in town

Tonight’s the night. The Golden Globes return to NBC, after a chaotic journey to recovery from a 2021 Times investigation that highlighted a lack of diversity in the organization’s membership and raised concerns about its ethics and financial practices.

Advertisement

The Tuesday night broadcast arrives with a challenging dual mandate: to showcase the Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. as a reformed and more professional organization while regaining its status as the film and TV business’s party of the year.

Billionaire investor Todd Boehly, who now serves as interim chief executive, knows he won’t be able to make 100% of the people happy after the industry-wide shunning of the HFPA. But publicists who led the boycott are generally supportive of the group’s internal changes, according to a walkup piece by Times writers Josh Rottenberg, Stacy Perman and Glenn Whipp. And they have an incentive to be. Their clients’ films, at least the headier Oscar bait-y ones, need all the help they can get from awards season.

Questions remain. There’s the ratings problem, as other awards shows face the same pressures when it comes to viewership. Also, the HFPA’s transformation is far from complete. The group is awaiting approval from California’s attorney general on a plan to transform the nonprofit association into a for-profit venture.

“I have nightmares where it doesn’t work too,” Boehly told Perman last month. “You can’t convince all the people all the time of anything. I appreciate that there’s skepticism. But I would say, ‘Come and check it out and see for yourself.’”

Diving into 2023

For many, January is a month for reconsidering old habits and self-destructive behaviors. As the entertainment industry creaks into the new year, here’s a warning, a resolution and a plea for the business of TV and movies.

Layoffs and purges

Advertisement

The prospects of a soft landing for entertainment, media and tech workers look slim in what Scott Galloway of New York University has labeled a “Patagonia vest recession,” referring to industries that went wild with spending during the COVID-19 pandemic and are now suffering financial whiplash.

Swaths of executives mistook the changes in consumer behavior as permanent rather than temporary adaptations to an extraordinary circumstance and have been dealing with the fallout. The pain has been felt by employees and creative types at a time when the economy is teetering.

Warner Bros. Discovery laid off droves of people in pursuit of $3.5 billion in cost savings and snuffed high-profile programming for tax write-offs and savings on royalties. Netflix shed workers. Amazon is axing 18,000 jobs from departments including HR and stores. Bob Iger kept Disney’s hiring freeze in place. AMC Networks scrapped shows it had already ordered. Paramount+ killed its “Workaholics” movie five weeks before production was scheduled to start.

Gunnar Wiedenfels, Warner Bros. Discovery’s chief financial officer, said last week at an investor conference that the era of writing off huge volumes of content is over, at least for his company. “We’re done with that chapter,” Wiedenfels said. The write-offs were “a reflection of an industry that went overboard and went on a spending frenzy,” he said. He also said streaming services are priced too low, so get ready to pay more.

As UTA head Jeremy Zimmer put it in an interview with Recode’s Peter Kafka, buyers aren’t scrimping on individual shows by, say, moving “The White Lotus” to Cleveland from Sicily. They’re just making less stuff.

Executives may be eager to put the chaos of 2022 behind them. But that’s not so easy. The cancellations and cost-cutting measures are sure to play a role in labor negotiations between writers and studios this year. Networks canceling shows isn’t new, but the trend of scrapping programs after their season renewals and during or after production is a disturbing one for creatives.

Advertisement

Overestimating estimates

If the enduring performance of “Avatar: The Way of Water” proves anything (beyond James Cameron’s ability to defy long odds), it’s that judging a film’s performance by whether its opening weekend box office missed or exceeded pre-opening forecasts is — at best — flawed.

After a $134-million domestic debut weekend, hampered by severe winter storms, was widely labeled a tepid start, the movie just kept going and is now 2022’s biggest blockbuster, with more than $1.7 billion in global ticket sales.

Cameron didn’t exactly help himself in the expectations department. Where most people would tamp down predictions, he implied that the “Avatar” sequel would have to hit around $2 billion to be considered a success. Whether “The Way of Water” hits that bar or not, it’s making money for Disney, and worries about the film’s cultural impact can now be cast from the airlock into outer space.

Measuring results against expectations is a simple and technically objective way to gauge performance. The problem is that pre-weekend box office forecasts are based not on studio’s own targets for what the movie needs to do to turn a profit but on audience surveys that determine the moviegoing public’s awareness and interest in any given title.

Box office tracking is a helpful exercise for studios looking to evaluate their marketing campaigns. It’s less useful when determining what really matters — profitability. The obsession with forecasting is how audiences might reasonably get the impression that “Halloween Ends” missed targets, though it was definitely profitable, while “Black Adam” hit expectations.

Advertisement

Profitability is sometimes difficult to determine accurately and is subject to studio spin. Just look at the spectacle of dueling trade stories about whether “Black Adam” made money, a discussion ultimately rendered moot by Warner Bros.’ decision to not do a sequel.

Better data, please

There was more streaming data than ever in 2022. However, we’re still waiting for a comprehensive, broadly accepted measurement system for steaming shows and movies, leaving analysts to make sense of disparate figures from streamers and third parties.

Netflix’s own hours-viewed metrics are useful for comparing the company’s shows with each other, though putting them in context is challenging (longer shows have an advantage in the rankings, for example).

Nielsen’s weekly top 10 lists are interesting documents of relative popularity (kudos, “Wednesday”). But the measurement giant includes viewing only on actual TV screens, which is incomplete. The firm’s charts are also delayed by several weeks, limiting their utility in a world where programming slips out of the zeitgeist in a matter of days.

Then there are the other players in the data wars: Parrot Analytics, with its calculations of “demand”; Antenna, which measures “churn”; ReelGood, with its own weekly charts based on its search system.

Advertisement

With all that, we have a pretty good idea of what’s a hit and what’s not, which is better than staring into a black box. But some streamers remain content to declare that the latest show was the “most watched” premiere on the platform without giving actual data.

The argument against disclosing better ratings data was once that the companies didn’t need to disclose it because they weren’t relying on commercials. That’s no longer the case. Here’s hoping the streaming industry’s greater acceptance of ads leads to a more intelligible system for measuring audiences.

Stuff we wrote

With pandemic and streaming boom, mental health support is coming to some film sets. Productions in the U.K. and the U.S. are seeing more focus from mental health advocates.

Despite turmoil at CNN, Chris Wallace is still ‘Talking.’ Wallace discusses the second season of his in-depth interview program on HBO Max and CNN.

Roku TVs are coming to market. Will they help the San Jose streamer rebound? Roku on Wednesday announced it would make its own branded TVs as it faces rising competition and a possible recession.

Legal dispute with financiers of ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ casts spotlight on controversial Russian oligarch. A lawsuit filed against New Republic Pictures alleges controversial Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev is the “silent partner” behind a slate of Paramount blockbusters, raising questions about the company’s financing.

These historic works are coming free from copyright. Why did it take so long? The cherished works from 1927 losing their copyright protection include the film “Metropolis,” a classic Laurel and Hardy short and the first Hardy Boys book, in a New Year’s bounty from our convoluted system.

ICYMI: Bob Iger orders Disney employees back to the office four days a week. Video game workers form Microsoft’s first U.S. labor union. Former Hollywood Reporter publisher Robert Dowling dies at 83. Disney vs. Florida ‘Don’t Say Gay’ feud advances with new proposed legislation. The Times podcast: 2022 in culture: Bad Bunny, the slap and more. Another Joe Rogan goof.

Advertisement

Number of the week

30.2 million dollars

With little competition other than the four-week-old “Avatar 2,” Universal’s freaky, highly meme-able doll movie “M3GAN” grossed a strong $30.2 million at the domestic box office. The horror film was produced by Jason Blum’s Blumhouse and James Wan’s Atomic Monster, and “M3GAN’s” success bodes well for the proposed merger of these two horror companies. It’s a strong start for the 2023 box office, with revenue up 39% year-to-date from last year, according to Comscore.

Runner up: 76%

Blame TikTok, streaming and YouTube for the decline of kids TV. Since 2017, prime-time kids’ television viewership has fallen 76%, according to Variety, faster than other categories of programming.

Best of the web

Films shoots

Yeah, there wasn’t much production activity over the holidays.

Production chart week to week
Advertisement

Finally ...

A chef oversees preparations and a detective assesses a scene.
“The Menu” (top) and “Glass Onion” offered two eat-the-rich narratives in 2022.
(Eric Zachanowich / Searchlight Pictures; John Wilson / Netflix)

2022 was the year when Hollywood tried to have it both ways with eat-the-rich revenge narratives, by letting audiences bask in the wish fulfillment of luxurious getaways while watching the 1% eat one another alive in various reverse-”Lord of the Flies” scenarios.

Anyone who watched “The Menu” on HBO Max and “Glass Onion” on Netflix in quick succession (pun intended) — especially after the finale of HBO’s “The White Lotus” — surely noticed that we’re in a particular moment of interrogating our billionaire worship problem.

I enjoyed all three. Both “Glass Onion” and “The Menu” set up their characters as easily identifiable types — the annoying foodie, the men’s rights personality, the influencer — and then knock them down with varying degrees of precision.

The satire could often be sharper, as Richard Lawson argued in a recent Vanity Fair piece. Lawson wants a more merciless takedown of these characters than the filmmakers are willing to deliver with their socially conscious comedy. Alas, perhaps a truly devastating critique of capitalism is too much to expect.

“One can hope, all the while aware of a nasty little catch-22,” Lawson wrote. “In order to make a movie that strips emperors down to their pathetic nakedness, those same rulers need to be hit up for money.”

Advertisement

Bonus track: David Ehrlich’s musical video essay counting down the best films of the year is one of the best things of every year.

Advertisement