Golden Globes leaders propose major reforms after Times investigation
The Hollywood Foreign Press Assn.’s leadership is calling on the organization to make substantive changes, including that board members resign if the group does not approve and implement proposed reforms.
The recommendations are based on a review done by the law firm Ropes & Gray to audit HFPA policies, membership requirements and bylaws following a Times investigation that highlighted the lack of Black members as well as allegations of ethical and financial lapses involving the organization. The firm was retained in March.
The board presented the findings to the group Monday during a Zoom meeting as the HFPA, the group behind the Golden Globe Awards, faced a self-imposed Thursday deadline to enact changes in response to external pressure.
Among the recommendations, according to a four-page draft: admit 20 new members this year (up from the current number of 86) “with a specific focus on recruiting Black members and building an environment to allow for their success.” The goal is to increase the membership by 50% over the next 18 months.
After a Times investigation, the Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. vowed to make sweeping changes, but the group behind the Golden Globes has struggled along the way.
As well, all current members will be required to meet the same standards as incoming members for reaccreditation of their membership; the Southern California residency requirement will be eliminated to expand eligibility “to any qualified journalist living in the U.S. who works for a foreign publication.”
The proposals also include adding independent non-HFPA members to serve on the board, and retaining professional management that could include a chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as well as a diversity, equality and inclusion strategist. Other proposed changes include strengthening term limits for officers and directors.
Under the proposals, which must be approved by members, the group would revise its code of conduct and review its committee structure, travel policies and conflict of interest disclosures. Accepting promotional gifts would be prohibited.
Additionally, all payments to members who serve on committees would be reviewed.
The Times’ investigation earlier this year found that the nonprofit HFPA regularly issues substantial payments to its own members in ways that some experts say could run afoul of Internal Revenue Service guidelines. HFPA members collected nearly $2 million in payments from the group in its fiscal year ending in June 2020 for serving on various committees and performing other tasks. The HFPA has said its compensation decisions are in line with similar nonprofit groups and vetted by independent experts.
The HFPA was expected to publicly announce its slate of reforms Thursday based on the Ropes & Gray review. The proposed changes in bylaws will be formally introduced to members in June and voted on after the group’s July membership meeting.
In a statement, Dick Clark Productions, the Golden Globes’ producing partner, said, “We are encouraged by the detailed and thorough nature of the plan unveiled today by the Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. We are hopeful the members commit to this and the actions necessary to build a transparent and inclusive future, which will have a tremendous impact on the organization and the art they honor.”
With the group behind the Golden Globes in crisis, here’s a playbill of the key actors in the drama that threatens the existence of the Hollywood Foreign Press Assn.
NBC, which broadcasts the Globes, said in a statement, “HFPA’s proposed plan is an encouraging step in the right direction. It outlines the thorough reforms that are critical for our continued relationship, and we appreciate the commitment that it demonstrates by the association’s leadership. The organization’s swift adoption and meaningful execution of the plan in its entirety are essential for the Golden Globes to remain on NBC.”
Here’s our developing coverage of the 2021 Golden Globes, the HFPA and the storytelling being honored.
The association first pledged to make “transformational change” after the Times investigation. Since then pressure has been mounting on the group.
Last month, the advocacy group Time’s Up released a detailed plan of action, calling for a total reset of the organization, including demands for the entire board to resign and members to step down and reapply under new requirements after one year. “The insular country club membership criteria and process must fundamentally change,” the group declared.
A week later, a group of more than 100 of the most powerful publicists representing the majority of entertainment talent and artists signed a blistering open letter warning the HFPA that they would withhold access to their clients if the organization did not take significant steps “to swiftly manifest profound and lasting change to eradicate the longstanding exclusionary ethos and pervasive practice of discriminatory behavior, unprofessionalism, ethical impropriety and alleged financial corruption endemic to the HFPA.”
But the organization has faced a series of setbacks.
In April, diversity strategist Shaun Harper and high-profile crisis consultant Judy Smith — who were brought on board some five weeks earlier — parted ways with the HFPA. Harper had signed on to work with the association for five years.
Their departures followed a 90-minute meeting with representatives of Time’s Up, Color of Change and a contingent of the publicists’ group, characterized as baffling and unproductive by several participants.
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.