Judge won’t let Sen. Graham delay testimony in Georgia election inquiry
Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina can’t put off his appearance before a special grand jury investigating whether then-President Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election in Georgia, a federal judge said Friday.
Earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May ordered Graham to honor his subpoena and testify for the grand jury. Graham’s attorneys appealed that order to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and asked May to stay her ruling while that appeal plays out. May declined that request in her order Friday.
The senator is scheduled to appear Tuesday, but has another motion to stay May’s ruling pending before the 11th Circuit.
Representatives for Graham did not immediately respond to messages from the Associated Press on Friday seeking comment.
Fulton County Dist. Atty. Fani Willis opened the election interference investigation early last year, and in July filed petitions seeking to compel testimony from seven Trump allies, including Graham.
Attorneys for the South Carolina Republican have argued that a provision of the U.S. Constitution provides absolute protection against a senator being questioned about legislative acts. But the judge said that “considerable areas of potential grand jury inquiry” fall outside that provision’s scope. The judge also rejected Graham’s argument that the principle of “sovereign immunity” protects a U.S. senator from being summoned by a state prosecutor.
Graham also argued that Dist. Atty. Willis, a Democrat, had not demonstrated any extraordinary circumstances that would call for compelling testimony from a high-ranking official. But the judge disagreed, finding that Willis had shown “extraordinary circumstances and a special need” for Graham’s testimony on issues related to an alleged attempt to influence or disrupt the election in Georgia.
Willis and her team say they want to ask Graham about two calls he allegedly made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and Raffensperger’s staff shortly after the 2020 election. In those calls, Graham asked about “reexamining certain absentee ballots cast in Georgia in order to explore the possibility of a more favorable outcome for former President Donald Trump,” Willis wrote in a petition.
Graham also “made reference to allegations of widespread voter fraud in the November 2020 election in Georgia, consistent with public statements made by known affiliates of the Trump Campaign,” she wrote.
State election officials from both parties and courts across the country, and even Trump’s attorney general, found there was no evidence of voter fraud sufficient to affect the outcome of the election.
Get our Essential Politics newsletter
The latest news, analysis and insights from our politics team.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.