Arizona high court declines most of Kari Lake’s appeal over her loss in governor’s race
The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to hear most of Republican Kari Lake’s appeal in a challenge of her defeat in the state’s gubernatorial race but revived a claim that was dismissed by a trial court.
In an order Wednesday, the state’s highest court said a lower court erroneously dismissed Lake’s claim challenging the application of signature-verification procedures on early ballots in Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix. The court sent the claim back to a trial court to consider.
Lake said late Wednesday that she’s thrilled with the ruling.
“The signature verification process in Maricopa County is a house of cards,” Lake said in a statement. “Thanks to this ruling my team will get the chance to topple it.”
Lake, who lost to Democrat Katie Hobbs by just more than 17,000 votes, was among the most vocal 2022 GOP candidates promoting former President Trump’s election lies, which she made the centerpiece of her campaign. While most other election deniers around the country conceded after losing their races in November, Lake did not.
In her challenge, the former TV anchor focused on problems with ballot printers at some polling places in Maricopa County, home to more than 60% of the state’s voters.
Democrat Katie Hobbs has been elected Arizona governor, defeating an ally of Donald Trump who falsely claimed the 2020 election was rigged.
The defective printers produced ballots that were too light to be read by the on-site tabulators at polling places. Lines backed up in some areas amid the confusion. Lake alleged that ballot printer problems were the result of intentional misconduct.
County officials say that everyone had a chance to vote and that all ballots were counted because those affected by the printers were taken to more sophisticated counters at election headquarters.
In mid-February, the Arizona Court of Appeals rejected Lake’s assertions, concluding that she presented no evidence that voters whose ballots were unreadable by tabulators at polling places were not able to vote.
Even a witness called to testify on Lake’s behalf confirmed that ballots that couldn’t initially be read at polling places may ultimately have been counted, the appeals court noted. And while a pollster testified that the polling place problems disenfranchised enough voters to change the election’s outcome, the appeals court said his conclusion was baseless.
Through most of the last 150 years, Arizona has been a geography of personal reinvention, ambitious and fraudulent schemes and hype that exceeded nature’s limits.
Lake’s attorneys also said the chain of custody for ballots was broken at an off-site facility where a contractor scans mail-in ballots to prepare them for processing. The lawyers asserted that workers put their own mail-in ballots into the pile rather than returning them through normal channels and that paperwork documenting ballot transfers was missing. The county disputes the claims.
Hobbs’ attorneys have said that Lake was trying to sow distrust in Arizona’s election results and that she offered no proof to back up her allegations.
Lake faced extremely long odds in her challenge, which required proving misconduct that specifically intended to deny her victory and that it resulted in the wrong woman being declared the winner.
Hobbs took office as governor Jan. 2.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
