Nearly 40 years after it was found by a monk in a Chinese cave, a fossilized chunk of jawbone has been revealed as coming from a mysterious relative of the Neanderthals.
Until now, the only known remains of these Denisovans were a few scraps of bone and teeth recovered in a cave in Siberia. DNA from those Siberian fossils showed kinship with Neanderthals. But the remains disclosed little else.
The new discovery was made in the Chinese province of Gansu, roughly 1,400 miles southeast of Siberia’s Denisova Cave. The right half of a jawbone with teeth is at least 160,000 years old, scientists reported Wednesday in the journal Nature.
No DNA could be found, but scientists recovered protein fragments that they compared to the Siberian DNA. That showed the fossil came from a Denisovan.
The find addresses several mysteries. One was why the Denisovans’ DNA indicated they were adapted to living at high altitudes when the Siberian cave was relatively close to sea level. The Chinese cave holding the jawbone, by contrast, is on the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau, about 10,800 feet high.
“Now we have an explanation,” said Jean-Jacques Hublin of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, one of the paper’s authors.
In fact, it was a “big surprise” that any human relative could live in the cold climate and thin air of the plateau at that time, more than 100,000 years before our own species showed up there, Hublin said.
Previous research had indicated that Denisovans must have lived somewhere other than Siberia because traces of their DNA can be found in several present-day populations of Asia and Australia whose ancestors probably didn’t pass through that region. The new finding expands their known range, although Hublin said it’s still not clear where Denisovans first appeared. (They are named for the Denisova cave because that’s where their remains were initially found.)
The new work was a long time in coming. The monk who found the fossil in 1980 gave it to a Buddhist leader, who passed it along to Lanzhou University in China. Study of it began in 2010.
The discovery also provides new anatomical details that can be compared to other fossils from China, some of which are “good candidates for being Chinese Denisovans,” Hublin said.
Other experts agreed the fossil could help identify other remains as Denisovan.
“We always assumed ... that Denisovans were distributed all across Asia,” said Bence Viola of the University of Toronto, who was not involved with the new study.
The Nature paper points out similarities to a fossil jaw reported in 2015 that was dredged by a fishing net off the coast of Taiwan. Perhaps the Denisovan range can be extended that far south, Viola said.
Such linking of fossils might eventually reveal Denisovan body shape and size, he said. From the scant known remains, “I assume they were large guys, but it’s kind of hard to prove,” Viola said.
The study’s approach of testing protein from the bone or teeth could also be used on fossils to look for evidence of Denisovan identity, said Eric Delson of Lehman College in New York, who wasn’t part of the study team. Even if a fossil is found not to be Denisovan, the analysis could reveal details of how it fits on the evolutionary tree, he said.
“The method potentially tells us a whole new way of looking at fossils,” he said.
Ritter writes for the Associated Press.