Court says there’s enough evidence to try Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha killings
There is enough evidence to warrant a trial for an Illinois 17-year-old accused of killing two men and wounding a third during a night of unrest in Wisconsin, a court commissioner ruled Thursday after a contentious hearing in which the defendant’s lawyer tried to show he had acted in self-defense.
Kyle Rittenhouse, of Antioch, Ill., is charged with homicide and attempted homicide for the Aug. 25 fatal shootings of Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber and the wounding of Gaige Grosskreutz during a night of unrest two days after the police shooting in Kenosha of Jacob Blake, a local Black man.
During a preliminary hearing conducted via video, Kenosha County Circuit Court Commissioner Loren Keating found that there was enough probable cause for the case to proceed to trial. Rittenhouse, who wore a covering over his nose and mouth, attended the Zoom hearing from the office of his attorney, Mark Richards.
Rittenhouse told police he was attacked while guarding someone’s business and that he fired in self-defense. He was freed from jail last month after posting $2-million bond, with most of the money raised through a legal defense fund set up by conservatives who view him as a patriot who was protecting other people’s property.
Officials and others view him as a vigilante who came to Kenosha armed with a semiautomatic rifle to provoke a response.
During the hearing, Richards showed the court several screenshots from videos recorded on the night of the shootings to try to show that Rittenhouse acted in self-defense, over numerous objections from Assistant Dist. Atty. Thomas Binger. The images showed Rittenhouse running from another protester who had a gun, and Rittenhouse on the ground as Huber struck him with a skateboard.
“The state is trying to put forth a one-sided, stilted view of what happened,” Richards told the court.
“NYPD Blue” and “Silver Spoons” actor Rick Schroder says he contributed “hundreds of thousands” of dollars to Kyle Rittenhouse’s bail and defense.
Binger argued that the defense was trying to use the hearing to “make this a self-defense case, and as the court has already indicated, that is an issue for trial. What happened before this incident ... does not go to the probable cause as to whether or not the defendant committed a felony, and I object to the relevance of this.”
Binger said the evidence shows a felony was committed, but Richards disagreed, saying, “The government can go off on their chaotic quest, but the evidence is clear.”
Keating also denied a defense request to dismiss two of the six counts against Rittenhouse. Richards argued that a misdemeanor count of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18 isn’t supported by the law — an argument the court rejected before.
Richards also sought the dismissal of a felony count of recklessly endangering the public’s safety by using a dangerous weapon. Richards said the state offered no proof to substantiate that charge, which was based on witness Richard McGinnis’ account of Rittenhouse firing his gun with McGinnis in the line of fire.
The shootings happened two days after a white police officer trying to arrest Blake shot the 29-year-old seven times in the back, paralyzing him from the waist down. Video of the shooting sparked several nights of protests in Kenosha, a city of about 100,000 near the Illinois border.
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.