Pre-embryos made in lab could spur research, and ethics debates
For the first time, scientists have used human cells to make structures that mimic the earliest stages of development, which they say will pave the way for more research without running afoul of restrictions on using real embryos.
A pair of papers published Wednesday in the journal Nature details how two teams of scientists independently made such structures.
They emphasized that their work is only for research, not reproduction, but it likely will pose new ethical questions.
“Studying early human development is really difficult. It’s basically a black box,” said Jun Wu, a stem cell biologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
“We believe our model can open up this field,” he said, if “you can test your hypothesis without using human embryos.”
These balls, called blastocysts, form a few days after an egg has been fertilized but before the cells attach to the uterus to become an embryo. To differentiate their models from blastocysts created through fertilization, the researchers refer to the structures as “iBlastoids” and “human blastoids.”
A day after a blockbuster report that researchers had edited harmful genetic mutations out of human embryos in an Oregon lab, an international group of genetics experts urged scientists against taking the next step.
“They shouldn’t be considered as equal to a blastocyst, although they are an excellent model for some aspects of biology,” said Jose Polo, an epigeneticist at Monash University in Australia who led the second research team.
Both groups emphasized that the structures they made were not the same as naturally occurring embryos, and it’s unclear whether they could develop into viable embryos.
“The blastoids are less efficient in terms of generating structures mimicking later-stage human embryos,” said Wu, whose team stopped growing the structure in a culture after four days.
Scientists previously generated similar structures of mouse cells in a lab, but this is the first time they have been made from human cells. The new models correspond to structures that develop about three to 10 days after fertilization, Wu said. Last year, researchers unveiled structures that model cells 18 to 21 days after fertilization.
Research involving human embryos and blastocysts is currently ineligible for federal funding in the U.S., and several states prohibit it outright.
Some scientists now use blastocysts donated from fertility clinics for research into the causes of infertility and congenital diseases. The new work should allow them to do such research at much larger scales, Polo said.
“This capacity to work at scale will revolutionize our understanding of these early stages of human development,” he said.
Using a powerful gene-editing technique, scientists have rid human embryos of a mutation responsible for an inherited form of heart disease that’s often deadly to healthy young athletes and adults in their prime.
The scientists emphasized that their creations were not intended to be used for human reproduction.
“There is no implantation,” said Amander Clark, a stem cell biologist at UCLA who co-authored the paper with Polo. “These structures are not transferred to a uterus or uterus-like structure,” she said. “There is no pregnancy.”
The distinction between blastocysts derived from fertilization and the structures created in a lab may not be so clear cut, said Shoukhrat Mitalipov, a human embryologist at Oregon Health and Science University who was not involved in the new research.
“Both groups show how closely they resemble real embryos,” he said. “If they are really as good as embryos, should they be treated as embryos?”
“This brings new ethical issues,” he said. “Are they going to be covered as human embryos? Should restrictions apply?”
Scientists previously tried to turn the lab-generated mouse cell structures into embryos, but they were not successful.
The optimal scenario for research is to “get as close to a real embryo as possible so you can learn from it, but not a real embryo so you don’t get into debates about the moral status of embryos,” said Alta Charo, a professor emerita of law and bioethics at the University of Wisconsin who was not involved in either of the new studies.
Get our free Coronavirus Today newsletter
Sign up for the latest news, best stories and what they mean for you, plus answers to your questions.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.