Pentagon leader in Iraq for talks on U.S. military presence

Acting U.S. Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan speaks Jan. 17 at the Pentagon.
(Martin H Simon / EPA/Shutterstock)
Washington Post

Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan made his first visit to Iraq on Tuesday to discuss the U.S. military’s future in the country in the wake of comments from President Trump that jeopardized plans for an ongoing counter-terrorism presence.

Shanahan, a longtime Boeing executive who was tapped to lead the Pentagon in December following predecessor James N. Mattis’ sudden resignation, was expected to meet with Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi and other Iraqi and U.S. officials.

His visit occurs as the Trump administration seeks to wind down the operation against Islamic State, the extremist group that took over large swaths of Iraq and Syria in 2014.

Pentagon officials have been considering shifting some American troops from Syria into Iraq after Trump’s unexpected December announcement that he would withdraw all 2,000 U.S. service members there. There are about 5,000 U.S. troops next door in Iraq, supporting local forces as they seek to ensure that remaining Islamic State cells cannot stage another full-fledged insurgency.


Militants have continued to conduct isolated attacks since a lengthy 2017 siege to retake Mosul, the Iraqi city that served as their base for three years.

Shanahan’s brief stop in Iraq follows a one-night visit to Afghanistan and takes place as the White House considers nominating him to become Trump’s second Defense secretary.

The selection of Shanahan, who has served as deputy Pentagon chief since mid-2017, would be a shift, given that he is an industry veteran and relative newcomer to military policy. He is the first person since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks who had not visited either Iraq or Afghanistan, the countries whose counterinsurgency wars have consumed the military’s attention for nearly two decades, before taking over at the Pentagon.

His talks in Baghdad follow a political outcry generated by Trump’s recent suggestion that he might keep a military presence in Iraq to “watch Iran,” his administration’s chief adversary in the Middle East.


“We might as well keep it. And one of the reasons I want to keep it is because I want to be looking a little bit at Iran, because Iran is a real problem,” Trump said in an interview with CBS.

The characterization, which differed from what had previously been described as a plan to keep U.S. troops there to guard against Islamic State’s resurgence, intensified controversy about the American military presence and prompted some Iraqi politicians to seek passage of legislation that would limit Washington’s role.

The question over the future of U.S. forces in Iraq was first raised early last year after Baghdad declared military victory over Islamic State, but the issue grew into a frequent talking point before Iraqi elections in May. Several candidates aligned with tickets that have a historically combative relationship with an American presence in Iraq argued the troops were no longer needed and that the United States should at most keep a small number of advisors in the country to continue to train Iraqi security forces.

In December, Trump’s unannounced visit to American forces in western Iraq turned the issue into a national obsession. Iraqis from both side of the political aisle were aghast that Trump had gone to Iraq and not met with the country’s leadership, saying it was an affront to Iraq’s sovereignty. Trump’s more recent comments drew fresh calls for the expulsion of American forces and condemnation from Iraq’s top Shiite cleric along with Iraqi President Barham Salih and former prime minister Haider Abadi. Both men are considered close allies by Washington.


Several political factions that are usually at odds, including those backed by Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr and a coalition representing several Iran-aligned militias, have called for fast-tracking a bill that would recommend severely limiting the number and activity of U.S. forces in Iraq when parliament reconvenes next month.

Speaking to reporters before his arrival, Shanahan said the primary goal of his talks in Baghdad was to hear directly from Iraqi leaders. “We are in Iraq at the invitation of the government. And our interests are to build Iraqi security capability,” he said.

A portion of Iraq’s army, built from the ground up following the George W. Bush administration’s 2003 invasion, collapsed in 2014 in the face of an Islamic State onslaught.

Shanahan, who will meet in Germany later this week with other Western countries battling Islamic State, will be among the U.S. leaders responsible for ensuring that militants cannot make a comeback once American troops depart Syria. Military leaders have said the Kurdish-dominated Syrian force that has been the main U.S. partner there needs significant outside support before it can do so alone.


“Risk can be high and risk can be low. So I think people’s concerns is just over the course of history they’ve seen how difficult it is to eradicate terrorism,” Shanahan said. “The follow-on, the support and security ... that will be an important part of the discussions [in Europe].”

An announcement is expected within weeks that U.S.-backed Syrian forces have recaptured final areas of eastern Syria controlled by the Islamic State.

In Baghdad, Shanahan will also meet with Lt. Gen. Paul LaCamera, who commands U.S. and foreign forces in Iraq and Syria.

Ryan and El-Ghobashy write for the Washington Post.