Downturn could alter tastes in housing
What will new homes look like after this recession, which has brought construction nearly to a halt? Consumers who have learned the bitter lessons about declining home values, burdensome debt and ephemeral retirement savings values may well demand houses different from the ones that dot our recently built neighborhoods.
History hints that this downturn could change our tastes. Homes built in the 1940s and ‘50s, for example, were usually smaller and simpler than large, frilly Victorians that had been in style before the Great Depression and World War II. Materials remained scarce for years after the war, and returning veterans, boosted by mortgage assistance provided under the GI Bill of Rights of 1944, bought Levittowns full of simple new houses as quickly as they could be made.
Virginia McAlester, author of the classic “A Field Guide to American Houses,” said that after this recession she expects smaller homes built closer together, but with more attention to their positioning on the lot to better preserve privacy and the occupants’ access to a little spot of nature.
At the turn of the last century, the wealthy lived in elaborate houses with 20 to even 40 rooms, which required a tremendous income just to keep them going. “You just had such overbuilding of size,” she said. “Now you have a lot of cul-de-sacs of great big, overbuilt houses way outside the city,”
Already, new homes are being simplified compared with those built during the go-go years. Some sprawling new houses needed a dozen or more roof gables to cover all the floor plan’s nooks and crannies, McAlester said: “You’re losing that two-story entry that was such a feature of McMansions. It may be replaced with a tower, but for 15 years you had to have it.
“We are going to have far more small houses and attached houses,” she predicted. The cost of building the roads, sewers and utility lines to serve compact neighborhoods is lower. Soundproofing will become more important when buyers are living closer to their neighbors or to retail and commercial properties.
“People will put a whole lot more into what it requires to have it be comfortable to live in,” she said.
Tomorrow’s buyers may be more conscious of the amount of income associated with maintaining a large-house lifestyle. “When you see people who have a whole room for a closet, or two-room closets, I mean, that reflects an incredible amount of discretionary income and wealth,” she said.
Some large suburban houses might be turned into multifamily homes, just as many large homes of the late 1880s and early 1900s were converted into duplexes once lifestyles grew more spare.
“There is actually a pattern of building out there that is called manor houses,” she said. From the front, they look like traditional houses, with a single entry. But the structure may incorporate two to five homes within, with separate entries tucked away on the sides of the building. “It’s been found to be a way of putting affordable housing into an area,” McAlester said.
Certainly that would provoke NIMBY wars and probably require changes to some local zoning laws, but breaking up homes into many units could be a way to preserve values if there aren’t enough people willing to bear the burden of big-house upkeep by themselves.
But Ed Hudson, director of market research for the National Assn. of Home Builders Research Center, isn’t convinced that tomorrow’s home buyers will really go for less space. What he does see, already, is a noticeable push from buyers to get more quality for their money.
“The McMansion going by the wayside? Well, maybe a little, but the average size is increasing,” Hudson said.
Surveys of buyers during this recession show that they want upgrades that signify lasting value. When buyers chose among free upgrades being offered by builders, their top choice was kitchen appliances, followed by granite countertops and wood flooring. Tomorrow’s value-minded buyer probably will also want upgraded front doors made of wood or fiberglass (and stained to look like wood), replacing painted steel doors.
“People are more into solid-wood cabinets,” Hudson said. Solid-wood boxes are sturdier than those framed with plywood or particle board.
Money spent building houses will be put where buyers can see it -- in stone or brick facades, for example. Builders are cutting back on spending where it doesn’t show. For example, as copper prices were soaring in recent years, builders shifted dramatically to water pipes made of PEX, a plastic. “PEX is now the most common water distribution piping in U.S. [new] homes,” Hudson said. “It’s pretty startling how rapidly it changed.”
Hudson and McAlester agreed that energy efficiency would be a lasting concern of buyers when they return to the market.
“Homes will be built in a greener and greener manner to reduce long-term utility costs,” McAlester said. “Cathedral ceilings are pretty expensive, at least in cold climates.”
Hudson expects homes to have more energy-monitoring systems and more solar-powered systems to provide electricity and hot water. He expects more use of geothermal heat pumps, which capitalizes on the fact that a few feet below the surface, the ground maintains a stable temperature of 50 to 60 degrees throughout the year. These heat exchangers use that steady temperature to heat and cool air inside the home. The equipment can cost several times more than an air-to-air heat pump, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, but greater efficiency can mean lower energy bills within five to 10 years.
“People are a lot more somber in mood and a lot less exuberant about continuing growth in wealth,” Hudson said.
--
Razzi writes for the Washington Post.
