A Nebraska court ruling Wednesday left the long-troubled
Lancaster County District Judge Stephanie F. Stacy struck down a 2012 law that gave Republican Gov.
"They thought the governor would be a rubber stamp and he was," said Brian Jorde, the attorney who represented the landowners.
Stacy's ruling further complicates a pending decision by the
Without an approved route, however, it is unclear whether the State Department would sign off on the $5.3-billion project. Neither Obama nor the department commented on Stacy's decision.
The administration is in no hurry to resolve the politically controversial issue, in part because many Obama supporters strongly oppose it. Extended litigation could provide an excuse to delay a decision on whether to grant the federal permit.
Environmentalists contend that blocking the pipeline would impede development of Canadian oil sands, which they consider significantly more damaging to the climate than conventional oil deposits. The pipeline would carry 830,000 barrels a day to Texas Gulf Coast refineries.
The Nebraska attorney general's office said it would appeal the ruling, starting a process that is likely to lead to the state Supreme Court and could take months to resolve, if not a year.
After delays and objections to the pipeline's original route, Nebraska's Legislature enacted a law in 2012 intended to expedite the routing and approval of major pipelines. The law allowed the governor to approve the projects rather than the Public Service Commission. Heineman approved a route in January 2013 that would traverse 250 miles underground through the state, and forwarded that approval to the Obama administration.
Stacy ruled that the law violated Nebraska's Constitution, which gives authority to approve pipeline routes to the Public Service Commission. In addition, she objected to granting TransCanada authority to use eminent domain to take land for the pipeline, saying the commission should have decided whether to grant that power to TransCanada.
Heineman's actions in approving the Keystone route, she ruled, "were predicated on an unconstitutional statute." She declared his decision "null and void."
Jorde, the landowners' attorney, said the law bypassed the careful review the commission would have given, handing the decision to officials who had "no training, no standards and no background" in such matters.
He said the project could be delayed by a 12-month review by the state Supreme Court, which would uphold Stacy's decision, and then another seven months for a Public Service Commission review — a total of 19 months before TransCanada would even get a decision on the route.
TransCanada was forced to amend its route once before, after environmentalists raised objections to a pipeline beneath the state's sensitive Sandhills area and above the huge Ogallala aquifer. If the company must amend the route again, the project will have to begin an entirely new regulatory approval process.
"This Nebraska court decision adds a new, major hurdle into the Keystone XL pipeline review," said Daniel J. Weiss, director of climate strategy at the Center for American Progress. "President Obama and Secretary [of State