In the rapidly changing legal landscape surrounding same-sex marriage, one thing stayed the same on Tuesday.
A week ago, a federal judge in Boise struck down Idaho’s ban on gay marriage, declaring in her opinion that "marriage is a fundamental right of all citizens, which neither tradition nor the majority may deny."
Before gay and lesbian couples could break out the rainbow-colored rice, however, Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter and Atty. Gen. Lawrence Wasden appealed the decision.
And an appellate court put a temporary hold on U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Candy Wagahoff Dale’s ruling that the state Constitution’s definition of marriage as only between a man and a woman is unconstitutional.
On Tuesday, a three-court panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the temporary stay should remain in place until Idaho's appeal can be heard, meaning that no same-sex marriages will be performed in the Gem State for the time being.
The court also set an expedited hearing date of Sept. 8.
In a concurring opinion, 9th Circuit Judge Andrew D. Hurwitz wrote that “it is almost certain that the Supreme Court will eventually resolve the merits of this appeal, and I do not venture to predict the court’s ultimate conclusion.”
However, Hurwitz continued, “I find it difficult to conclude that the Idaho ban on same-sex marriage would survive interim 9th Circuit review.”Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times