We firmly hope he's wrong, and several developments in the last few days suggest that he may be. Most important is a shift of opinion in Congress. In May, the Senate voted 90 to 6 to block the transfer of detainees to the United States and denied the administration $81 million it had requested to close Guantanamo. Last week, however, the Senate approved and sent to Obama a budget measure that allows the government to continue transferring detainees here as long as it develops new guidelines and provides 15 days' notice before a prisoner is moved.
That legislation will make it easier to close the now infamous detention center, where the population has dwindled from nearly 800 to 220, 75 of whom have been cleared for release. But it won't resolve the question of whether the remaining detainees will be tried in federal court, as they ought to be, or before military commissions. Nor does it clarify what Obama plans to do with detainees he says "cannot be prosecuted yet who pose a clear danger to the American people." As we have said before, indefinite detention is repugnant to the U.S. legal tradition and should be a last resort.
George W. Bush discovered that when Congress and the executive branch give short shrift to the rights of detainees, the courts will intervene. Last week, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether a judge had the authority to order the release in the U.S. of 14 Uighurs, Chinese Muslims who were wrongly held at Guantanamo and who fear persecution if they are sent home. The Obama administration opposes giving courts authority over what it sees as immigration decisions. So why not render the case moot by treating the Uighurs as political refugees?
The legal axiom that "justice delayed is justice denied" applies with special force to Guantanamo. Whether they are dangerous terrorists or, like many of those already released, bystanders caught up in a post- 9/11 dragnet, these detainees have languished for years without adequate due process. Obama should abide by his deadline for closing Guantanamo and bring the same urgency to guaranteeing that the relocated detainees have their day in court.
Digg
Twitter
Facebook
StumbleUpon
The terrorists committed an act of war, not a civil crime. If there is a trial, it should be in Gitmo and it should be a military tribunal. It will cost millions of tax payer dollars for the security and trial in New York. All five of these terrorists have pleaded guilty to crimes punishable by the death penalty. It would cost just a very few dollars to carry those death penalties out by firing squad today. Many of us would donate the bullets or carry out the sentence free of charge. Eric Holder is the person that freed the Puerto Rican terrorists. It sickens me that he is the U.S. Attorney General. He and Obama are having the trial in New York because Obama's main priority in life is getting his face on TV. He loves to be the focus of the liberal media. He is arrogant and in love with himself. He thinks he is the Messiah. Obama and his crew of ultra socialists are the worst disaster to hit America, in its history. The politically correct people that voted for this lazy, indecisive, incompetent, self promoting, pro-islamic idiot for president are getting what they deserve. The onlky problem is, we veterans and patriots have to live with his total failure too. Keep Gitmo. Shoot the terrorists where they stand today.
Montani (11/14/2009, 8:02 AM )