Trust buster

President Bush's lack of confidence in government lets down the people who need its help.
January 29, 2008

» Discuss Article    (9 Comments)

Two themes ran through President Bush's final State of the Union address Monday night, as he made the case for his continued relevance: Trust the American people, he said -- again and again -- and empower them to run their own lives. Trust the people with their money, and the economy will come around. Trust them to demand better schools, and schools will improve. Trust scientists to think big about global warming, and they will hit on solutions. All of that is fine, and yet for all of Bush's trust in the American people, he also made clear that he lacks essential confidence in their government -- his government.

Bush had his moments. He struck back against Congress' practice of funding projects with earmarks that are not publicly debated or disclosed. He called for strengthening No Child Left Behind. He proposed purchasing crops directly from farmers in the developing world to combat famine. Those are useful recommendations, and Congress should heed them.

But Americans have many troubles, and they are asking their government for help. Healthcare has become unaffordable for millions. Bush hears those woes but rejects sensible solutions for ideological reasons -- favoring "consumer choice, not government control." Illegal immigration has inflamed passions nationwide and stirred irrationality in the president's own party. To his credit, he tried to win a reform bill last year, but he failed, testament in part to his ebbing influence. On Monday, he sounded the call again, but with no details or hope of victory.

In Iraq, he trusts his generals but ignores the limits of their power. Yes, brave Americans have helped stabilize the military situation in that nation, but political reconciliation, not indefinite occupation, is what will bring lasting peace to Iraq. Bush offered no hint of how his government, in its remaining year, can bring that about. That he mentioned global warming at all suggests an evolution in his thinking about a phenomenonwhose existence he once questioned. Yet he's still relying on future technology and resisting market mechanisms to encourage that technology.

Government is not the passive instrument of bureaucrats. It is the active agent of a democratic people. When the people genuinely need its help, the government should act, not merely encourage. In this, Bush has failed to give his nation what it needs. Too many Americans face the loss of homes, too many are in prison. Afghanistan is unstable, Iran threatens. Osama bin Laden is still at large.

Ours is, a great president once proclaimed, "a government of the people, by the people, for the people." This president has done too little to uphold that conviction. His trust in America's people is undoubtedly genuine, but his unwillingness to act on their behalf is responsible for our fading trust in him.





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Discuss today's editorial.

Comments will close after two weeks.
 
1. Your Joking right !!..For the last 8 years the Times has made a pretty obvious point that we can't trust the government,,Yet now you stress anyone who doesn't trust the Government is a fool??? Come on LA Times staff make up your mind and get off your fake fence !! The government screws up everything it does,,Get them outta my life please and my life will be so much happier, just like I when canceled my LA Times subscription( which seems to really be helping the job security at the paper).
Submitted by: shane
7:51 AM PST, Jan 30, 2008
 
2. We need a lot of things from OUR government, but consider that that so much social-benefit legislation is designed to please our corporate masters. Your goverment wanted to let you buy prescription drugs imported from Canada, but big pharma didn't like that because they couldn't compete on price, so they rigged the system to benefit them. So much for the free market!
Submitted by: Chris
5:08 PM PST, Jan 29, 2008
 
3. I beg to differ, it is NOT lack of confidence in government -- it is lack of any sort of BELIEF in government on the part of George Bush and other Conservatives who seem to think it's still the wild west and every man for himself -- women and children, especially, be damned!
Submitted by: Carolan
2:05 PM PST, Jan 29, 2008
 





Glenn Reynolds says Palin may be. Katherine Mangu-Ward says Republicans don't have a celebrity of Obama's caliber.


   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: Race to the finish
In today's Los Angeles Times editorial pages, race. Aren't we past all that? No....
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
The webcasting deal: What took so long?
If the numbers were so stark, why did it take a virtual eternity for...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT