ENDORSEMENTS 2008

No on Proposition 4

The parental notification measure is virtually the same as two previous anti-abortion measures that failed.
October 23, 2008

» Discuss Article    (2 Comments)

Proposition 4, which would require parental notification before a minor could have an abortion, is as noxious as the two previous, nearly identical ballot measures that sought to turn back the clock on abortion rights. And Californians are as pro-choice as they were back when those measures were defeated. So why is Proposition 4 leading, though narrowly, in recent polls?

Surely voters no longer are misled by the emotional appeal of the title, "Sarah's Law," which refers to a girl who wasn't named Sarah, didn't live in this state and wouldn't have been covered by such a law.

The supporters of Proposition 4 have managed to frame their campaign around two ideas, both misleading, that hold particular appeal for voters. One is that, in addition to allowing girls to seek court permission for an abortion, it will give those who justifiably fear telling their parents an "out" by allowing them to notify another adult relative instead. This would indeed give the measure more credence, if it were true. But in order to use it, the girl would have to accuse her parents, in writing, of child abuse, with the accusation to be forwarded to law enforcement authorities. It's the equivalent of telling girls they can get an abortion by walking into a police station and having their parents arrested.

The campaign also assumes a kinder face by saying that this is about protecting girls from adult sexual predators; newly knowledgeable parents would put an end to the sex crimes. But a study released in September by UC San Francisco found that few girls have relationships with significantly older males and that the percentage of those who do does not appear to change with notification laws.

In fact, notification laws don't achieve most of the supposedly desired results, according to the report. A comparison of Minnesota, which has a notification law, and Wisconsin, which doesn't, showed that girls who went to abortion clinics were just about equally likely to tell a parent. Pregnancy rates do not fall in states with notification laws; in some states, abortion rates fall but teen birthrates rise, and many more girls report leaving the state for an abortion.

Perhaps because they put off telling a parent, or go to court to avoid doing so, girls in states with such laws are likelier to get an abortion later, during the second trimester of pregnancy, which increases the chance of complications. Clearly, protecting the health and safety of girls isn't the key consideration here. Proposition 4 is a first step toward reversing hard-won and increasingly threatened reproductive rights. Californians, with their strong record of upholding such rights, should see through the ruses and vote no on Proposition 4.





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion

Comments will close in two days
 
1. the way to ensure "parental notification" by a young woman who needs an abortion is for the parents to build a good relationship with their daughter so that she is willing to tell them. forcing it doesn't work - read the article, where it compares minnesota and wisconsin. the rights in question are the rights of the daughter. no one wants more abortions, but life as an unwanted child is HARD and often filled with abuse, poverty and fear. (don't ask me how I know this!)
Submitted by: bunny
1:34 PM PDT, Oct 23, 2008
 
2. Is the sanctity of "abortion rights" so unassailable by the Times and its pro-choice uber alles ilk that a young girls desire undergo a major medical procedure with potential long term physical and emotional consequences trumps a parents desire to be part of that decision? What a load of bull. Prop 4 isn't an attempt to undermine Roe v Wade in the least; it's about providing PARENTS of young girls, the authority being a parent rightfully obligates. The supposed threat to abortion rights FOR ADULTS is a smokescreen. As a parent of a young daughter, I enthusiastically support Prop 4.
Submitted by: J Cir
11:06 AM PDT, Oct 23, 2008
 




Whether women's anti-aging products actually work is almost beside the point.
The leaf peepers have it all wrong. It's in the full bloom of summer that western Massachusetts really shines. Photos
Famous faces discuss fashion. Photos
If fashion makes the man, we don't know what kind of man that makes Sasha Baron Cohen's Bruno. Photos | Review
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT