Opinion L.A. Observations and provocations from The Times' Opinion staff and guest writers
Opinion

L.A. voters didn't just turn their backs on Berniecrat progressivism, they went positively Clintonesque

Whoa, what just happened to the progressive Democrat movement in Los Angeles? Voters in the 34th Congressional District not only rejected the Berniecrats in the special election to replace Xavier Becerra on Tuesday, they veered decidedly Clintonesque.

Two Democrats, Assemblyman Jimmy Gomez and attorney and former city planning commissioner Robert Lee Ahn, took a commanding lead in the initial returns — 28% and 19%, respectively. Though provisional votes are still being counted, their lead is broad enough that it seems unlikely the results will flip in the final tally.

Gomez and Ahn are moderate compared to many of the other Democrats in the race, though still raging liberals next to the Republicans in power in D.C. Gomez endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in the primary. He’s also the Democratic Party favorite. Ahn touted his “business sensibility” in the campaign.

Arturo Carmona, a former staffer in the Sanders campaign, Wendy Carrillo, a Sanders supporter, and Kenneth Mejia, the Green Party candidate, must be a little surprised they did so poorly — collectively not quite 15%. The 34th District, which includes neighborhoods in northeast Los Angeles, east Los Angeles and downtown, voted for Bernie Sanders in the June presidential race. It was one of just a handful of districts to do so in California.

What happened? Did voters change their minds about single-payer healthcare and the corrupting influence of money in politics? Or did progressives stay home, not able to work up the same enthusiasm since last year’s defeat? It seems possible, since turnout so far was less than 10%. Would it have made a difference if Bernie himself had stumped for one of the candidates?

Or was this a case of party loyalty and money trumping all other factors? Ahn and Gomez raised the most money — more than half a million in total — and prevailed.

We may never know for certain why progressivism faltered in this particular race, but it would be rash to pronounce the death knell for the movement at large based on this one, particularly low-turnout race.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion and Facebook

MORE FROM OPINION

Let's count the ways Donald Trump has gone where no president has gone before

Trump's ineptness is unparalleled, but Americans — and the L.A. Times — should have seen this coming

Here's an easy way to fight L.A.'s traffic and boost transit ridership — reward commuters who don't drive

Copyright © 2017, Los Angeles Times
59°