IRAN: Considering Hillary Clinton’s ‘obliterate’ remarks


This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.

A supporter of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has sent a note in a response to an earlier post suggesting that the presidential candidate’s statement vowing to ‘totally obliterate’ Iran if it were to launch an attack on Israel was taken out of context.

Actually, what she said Tuesday on ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’ was that she would ‘totally obliterate them’ even if they merely ‘consider’ launching an attack on Israel.


Here’s a clip from the interview with ABC’s Chris Cuomo:

Below a transcript of the entire exchange:

CHRIS CUOMO: You said if Iran were to strike Israel, there would be ‘massive retaliation.’ Scary words. Does ‘massive retaliation’ mean you’d go into Iran? You would bomb Iran? Is that what that’s supposed to suggest? CLINTON: Well, the question was, if Iran were to launch a nuclear attack on Israel, what would our response be? And I want the Iranians to know that if I am president, we will attack Iran. And I want them to understand that. Because it does mean that they have to look very carefully at their society. Because whatever stage of development they might be in their nuclear weapons program, in the next 10 years during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them. That’s a terrible thing to say, but those people who run Iran need to understand that. Because that, perhaps, will deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish, and tragic.

Borzou Daragahi in Beirut

P.S. The Los Angeles Times issues a free daily newsletter with the latest headlines from the Middle East, the war in Iraq and the frictions between the West and Islam. You can subscribe by registering at the website here, logging in here and clicking on the World: Mideast newsletter box here.