Is the high-end immune? Maybe, maybe not

This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.

Whether expensive homes in prestigious areas will escape the housing crash remains a hotly debated topic. I hear from many readers (and see some examples where I live) of houses still selling, sometimes quickly, and sometimes for prices higher than the owners paid just a couple of years ago.

Yet economists I interview contend prices at the high end are just sticky -- they take longer to fall, but do so eventually. Holdout sellers at some point cave in, raising supply, and trade-up buyers from other areas don’t have as much money to buy in the pricier neighborhoods, squeezing demand.

John Karevoll at DataQuick Information Systems has provided a breakdown of Southern California June home sales that shows the top end is falling as well.

The median price for the top tenth of homes sold in June was $900,000, down from $1,129,500 the same month a year ago. That’s a 20% drop. Last June was the price peak for that market segment, according to DataQuick.

The bottom tenth of homes sold fared worse, with a 41% drop in the median sales price.

But the June decline in the top tenth shows a reversal from last summer. In June 2007, the median sales price for that tier was UP 3%. Last June, prices in the bottom tenth had fallen 11% from the previous year.

So the top is sliding. Or is it ? The June median sales price was actually UP from the May median for the tier of $875,000, with roughly the same number of transactions. A one-month bump may not mean much, of course. A few more months of data will give us a better picture.

--Peter Y. Hong, Times staff writer

Comments? Questions? Email peter.hong@latimes.com