Advertisement
Money & Company

L.A. drops in “sustainability” rankings

By Jessica GarrisonStaff Writer 
Share

This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.

It’s no surprise that Los Angeles should lag behind such emerald stars as Seattle, Portland, Ore., and San Francisco in terms of sustainability … but Cleveland? Omaha? Dallas?

Apparently so. According to the 2008 SustainLane U.S. City Rankings, which rate the nation’s 50 largest cities in terms of urban sustainability, Los Angeles is behind those cities … and 21 others as well.

Advertisement

The city fell three spots from last year. Why? Well, one clue come from the fact that rankings are based on factors including air quality, roadway congestion, sprawl and housing affordability.

-- Jessica Garrison

Your thoughts? Comments?

Photo Credit: L.A. Times
Money & Company
Jessica Garrison

Jessica Garrison writes about Northern California for the Los Angeles Times. She has previously covered Los Angeles City Hall, courts, education and the environment. As a reporter, her work has won a National Magazine Award for Public Service, among other honors. Work she has edited has won a George Polk Award and was a finalist for a Goldsmith Prize. Her book, “The Devil’s Harvest,” told the story of a contract killer who stalked Central Valley farm towns for years while authorities failed to bring him to justice. She is a graduate of UC Berkeley.

Advertisement