Your six full-page pictures of high-priced clothes could only be afforded by upper-upper middle-class consumers. In essence, they are “ads.” I want back the “Home” section of the old Home magazine, i.e. ideas for houses, rooms, furniture and decorations for lower- and middle-income consumers. Large picture spreads of mansions of moneyed moguls give most of us neither help nor insight when working in our homes. Please keep your “ads” for the fancy duds in clothing sections of your paper.
Bonnie M. Hyam