Advertisement

Segregated Housing, Schools Linked by Federal Judge

Share
From the Washington Post

A federal judge, in the first decision of its kind, ruled Wednesday that city officials in Yonkers, N.Y., maintained a segregated school system by refusing to build low-income housing on the exclusive east side of town for more than three decades.

In a 600-page decision, U.S. District Judge Leonard B. Sand detailed the causal relationship between segregated neighborhoods and segregated schools. He said that Yonkers officials are liable for the perpetuation of mostly white and mostly black schools because they deliberately relegated all subsidized housing projects to the minority neighborhoods on the city’s west side.

Potent Legal Weapon

Civil-rights lawyers said that the ruling would provide a potent legal weapon for private plaintiffs to challenge patterns of housing and school segregation in other cities, but that they do not expect the Reagan Administration to bring such cases.

Advertisement

The Justice Department, which sued Yonkers in the final days of the Jimmy Carter Administration, briefly considered dropping the case after President Reagan took office but pressed ahead with the NAACP as a joint plaintiff.

Sand scheduled hearings for next month to consider what remedies should be imposed on the New York City suburb of 200,000.

“The unusual thing about this case is we alleged that the city’s housing discrimination was a cause of school segregation, and the judge agreed with us,” said Justice Department attorney Sarah Vanderwicken. The city had contended that the segregation was the product of people moving where they wanted.

No Other Suits

Michael Sussman, an attorney for the National Assn. for the Advancement of Colored People, said that the Reagan Administration has brought no similar cases and that it is up to civil-rights groups to attack official segregation elsewhere.

“The kind of objective evidence presented in Yonkers can be found in many other places,” Sussman said. “The pattern of state-supported segregation of housing is one that’s replicated everywhere, and the obvious consequence of that is school segregation. Until we acknowledge that, we’ll have the continued perpetuation of an underclass.”

John Zakian, a spokesman for Yonkers Mayor Angelo Martinelli, said the ruling was “no surprise” and that the city hopes to settle the case in the coming weeks. He said Martinelli was reelected this month after arguing that “we are going to have to put low-income housing in east Yonkers.” But he added that the City Council has blocked the mayor’s attempts to settle the suit.

Advertisement

The Westchester County community is divided by the Saw Mill River Parkway, which has served as a racial dividing line. Expensive split-level homes and 90% white schools cover the hills to the east, while the run-down west side features minority schools and more than 30 public housing projects.

After hearing more than 100 witnesses, the judge ruled that city officials deliberately concentrated the subsidized housing on the west side, a fact that led to a cutoff of federal community development funds two years ago. Sand cited the testimony of former Yonkers Mayor and former Lt. Gov. Alfred del Bello, who said that race was a factor in housing decisions.

Reassigned Teachers

Sand also ruled that city and school officials had redrawn school boundaries, closed schools, reassigned teachers on the basis of race and steered minority students into certain programs in a deliberate effort to maintain segregated schools.

Despite extensive settlement negotiations, the City Council refused to approve two sites on the affluent east side for low-income housing, and the school board rejected two modest busing plans.

Emotions have run high on both sides. Herman Keith, former president of the Yonkers NAACP, told of being unable to buy a house on the east side and of watching his children reassigned to minority schools.

But Michael Cipriani, a former council member and opponent of subsidized housing, said in a 1983 interview: “My home is worth $225,000. I don’t want any apartment building next to me. That’s what I moved to the suburbs for.”

Advertisement
Advertisement