For the Record - Nov. 24, 1985
In a Nov. 10 Opinion article by Benno C. Schmidt Jr. on Atty. Gen. Edwin Meese III and the Supreme Court, a sentence was mistranscribed. It should have read: “Brennan’s answer will, I fear, tend to reinforce those like Meese, who believe that if the court is not tightly tethered to a concrete version of original intent, then the alternative is unfettered judicial discretion.”
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
