Advertisement

The Stones Cry Out : A CAMBODIAN CHILDHOOD 1975-1980 by Molyda Szymusiak; translated from the French by Linda Cloverdale (Hill & Wang: $17.95; 225 pp.) : SPIRIT OF SURVIVAL by Gail Sheehy (Morrow: $17.95; 342 pp., illustrated)

Share
</i>

To survive in Cambodia (Kampuchea) from 1975 to 1980, one had to be “deaf and dumb.” It is a phrase that crops up often in talks with survivors. “I was,” they say, “deaf and dumb.” Any sign, any indication of education or knowledge or connection to the former government, anything at all could bring death.

At the age of puberty, on the fragile edge of womanhood, Buth Keo was pushed from her home onto the highway and into the hell that was Cambodia (Kampuchea) under the Khmer Rouge. It was April 17, 1975, and Buth Keo was only one among the entire population of Phnom Penh, the nation’s capital, who were forced to march to an uncertain future.

Nearly 2 million people died in the next five years. Buth Keo survived.

Her story, “The Stones Cry Out,” is one of the most important religious books of our time. It is witness literature of the highest form. Not a self-righteous tract, not a mere recounting of horrors that catch our breath and force us to turn our head when we hear of them, her first person narrative is a paean of praise to identity, to the universality of God, to gentleness and love in the midst of unremitting terror.

Advertisement

Her spiritual growth under the Khmer Rouge is told calmly. Her identity emerges as the agony increases. As is traditional in religious autobiography, there is the overcoming of fear as a major steppingstone to the realization of a core identity outside of material life.

“From time to time we crossed a clearing, where we saw more corpses, heads and limbs scattered about,” she writes. “After seeing these horrors I felt stronger. ‘They won’t get me.’ ” She adds: “I think that’s when I stopped being afraid of ghosts.”

Another time, and another horrible scene confronts her: She is alone and lost, and praying she says: “Divine Buddha, and all those whom I don’t know and can’t see, come help me.” She then hears the voice of her hermit grandfather speaking to her, reminding her that “heaven is the same the world over and that although people gave him different names in different countries, there was only one Divine Being. You mustn’t say the Buddha is the only one. Each country has its protective spirits, and heaven is for everyone.”

The nightmare of autogenocide in Cambodia (Kampuchea) is incomprehensible to both East and West. If the Holocaust has yet to be explained after 45 years, then how much more difficult it is to explain death at the hands of those of the same religion, the same language, the same skin tone, the same history? How much more difficult it is to explain destruction in the name of Angka than in the name of Hitler.

Angka was to be the collective Kampuchea. It was, in fact, the collective nightmare that most westerners know from the movie “The Killing Fields.” The literature of those who survived Angka is only now emerging.

There is a tone in Buth Keo’s narrative that is like the one found in Hassidic tales of the Holocaust. It is the tone, inaudible to many ears, that says to the hearer: “Keep moving, have faith, there is another place, another time waiting for you.”

Advertisement

The title of this singular and brilliantly told story is from the New Testament, the book of Luke, “If my disciples were silenced, the stones themselves would cry out.” Deaf and dumb no more, Buth Keo is now Molyda Szymusiak, a young woman living in Paris with her adoptive parents.

Renamed after her ordeal, in the tradition of Jacob wrestling with the angel, Molyda Szymusiak’s words are the beginning of understanding what happened in Cambodia during the years of her childhood. Her father died, her mother died, her brother and three sisters died and now, in another place and another time, she thanks her adoptive parents and her two cousins who survived with her. They are now her adoptive sisters. It is a quiet note, in keeping with the clarity and elegant simplicity of her book.

It is obvious that Molyda Szymusiak had some help in remembering and translating her memories into the moving and profound text that is witness to the best and the worst in human life. But there is no question that “The Stones Cry Out, A Cambodian Childhood 1975-80” is the essential work of one, alert, aware, reverent voice. It is a voice as significant for the Cambodians as the voice of Anne Frank was for the Jewish people of the Holocaust. It is a voice that is sacred.

Gail Sheehy is probably best known in this country as the author of “Passages.” Her work is in the genre usually referred to as “pop sociology.” Sheehy describes herself fearing loneliness and middle age, and when “the man in her life” urges her to join him in southeast Asia just as she has completed a cross-country book tour and is about to suffer what she calls “writers paralysis,” she goes along with the idea.

Over breakfast after an amorous first night in the Oriental Hotel of Bangkok, she reads on the veranda a newspaper story that begins, “Thousands of children, most of them under twelve, orphaned by the genocide in Cambodia, have been existing in holding centers in Thailand for over two years. . . . They have scant hope of being adopted or resettled in third countries.”

Sheehy goes to a refugee camp. She meets a beautiful young girl, and eventually the girl arrives in New York and becomes Sheehy’s daughter. She also becomes the subject of this book insofar as it is possible for Sheehy ever to get herself out of the way.

Advertisement

The new daughter, Mohm, is a young woman who also lived through what Molyda Szymusiak experienced. Their stories, like the stories of all Khmer Rouge survivors, conform to a single pattern.

There is no food. There is starvation. Parents die. Heads are cut off. Piles of heads must be walked over. Open sores and no reason and no future and no hope--these are the only reality. However grisly, these stories are well worth the telling.

But the story Sheehy tells in “Spirit of Survival” loses much impact because it consists of snatches of her own loves and life, snatches of Mohm’s life in Kampuchea, snatches of their lives together and, as if that were not enough, a magazine piece about the nature of survivors.

What Sheehy says she is trying to do, “given the gift of Mohm in my life,” is to “choose to search for the universal truths in the particular.” Unfortunately, what Sheehy seems to accomplish in her book is only to dilute the story of Mohm by letting us all know a bit too well how she and her love life are coming along, informing us as to the nature of survivors in general and exposing us both to both her journalistic encounters with Cambodia and the depth of her new-found motherhood.

Each one of those ideas would have been enough for a book. As it is, a sense of adulteration runs through the work.

Of the early days of Mohm in the United States, Sheehy ruminates, “So far, so good. She had survived for months on the run in the Cambodian jungle, but would she survive the first months on her own hook in the jungle of New York City?”

Advertisement

There really is no comparison, and this is the central problem with “Spirit of Survival” as a serious book. There is no comparison between the life of a well-to-do-white woman over 40 and the life of a young woman under the Khmer Rouge.

Sheehy is indiscriminate in the text. She is fond of sweeping generalizations and a certain dogmatism born of pop sociology. “Once again I marveled at her (Mohm’s) ability to turn away instantaneously from the bitter to the blitheful. That is why children are natural survivors,” she says.

That may be one reason children are natural survivors, but one suspects that it is not the only reason. Sheehy, however, lives in her world; and although there is obviously much that is worthwhile in it, little of the mystery, little of the transforming nature of spirit comes through in her rather overworked text.

If one is interested in the nature of horror and love, the history of our times in the lives of survivors, especially female survivors, one would do well to read and re-read “The Stones Cry Out” and skip the television talk shows promoting Sheehy’s book.

The purity of Molyda Szymusiak’s tale becomes only more apparent as one compares it with Sheehy’s attempt to combine the art of the witness narrative with her observations on American life in the ‘80s.

Advertisement