Slow-Growth Controversy
Garcia and Shapiro make a good point: “ . . . the city’s major asset--its ability to grant variances and to change zoning”--should be used for “stimulating growth in economically depressed areas of the city.” I say great. Let the developers make a buck by doing what’s in the public interest--something for the have-nots.
But to grant variances and changes of zoning merely so the developers can make a buck--and the public be damned (as in Pacific Palisades)--this can only breed voter rebellion.
By clamping down on this, Garcia, as president of the City Planning Commission, can help avert that rebellion.
Sure developers deserve to live--but the home dweller too. All of us deserve protection from the doubling population-and-traffic density that’s bound to stem from their monstrous four-story condos.
HAROLD WATERHOUSE
Pacific Palisades
More to Read
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.