Judge Bork’s Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing
What Bork defines as judicial restraint is in reality judicial irresponsibility!
The original intent of the framers was for the Court to uphold individual liberty; Bork’s intent is to pass the buck to the executive and legislature. His appointment would certainly upset the delicate checks and balances the framers intended.
Regardless of their political views, the Senate should not permit Bork to enact his personal agenda for the repeal of American liberties. If we must have a conservative appointee, let it be one who truly wishes to conserve, not destroy.
MICHAEL DAVID WADLER
Los Angeles
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
