Removal of Reagan From Office Suggested to Baker : Report Said Aides Described President as Depressed, Inept in Wake of Iran-Contra Crisis

Times Washington Bureau Chief

Most high-level White House aides believed that President Reagan was so depressed, inept and inattentive in the wake of disclosures about the Iran-Contra scandal early in 1987 that the possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment to remove him from office was raised in a memo to Howard H. Baker Jr., then Reagan’s chief of staff.

Former White House aide James Cannon, confirming facts reported in a newly published book, said in an interview Wednesday that he wrote a March 1, 1987, memorandum based on the aides’ concern and raising the possibility of applying the amendment.

Baker took the recommendation seriously and, with Cannon and two of his own aides, spent part of a day observing Reagan’s behavior before concluding that the President was sufficiently competent to perform his duties, according to the book.


Accepted Concerns

However, Baker later said that, even though he accepted Cannon’s concerns as legitimate, he never seriously considered invoking the 25th Amendment.

“I didn’t take Cannon’s memo lightly,” Baker said in an interview Wednesday, “but, from the first time I saw him (Reagan), he was fully in control and I never had any question about his mental competence.”

The White House refused to comment directly.

The existence of Cannon’s memo and facts leading up to it are reported in “Landslide: The Unmaking of the President, 1984-88,” by Jane Mayer, a Wall Street Journal reporter who covered the Reagan White House, and Doyle McManus, a Los Angeles Times reporter who has covered the Iran-Contra scandal.

The book gives a detailed behind-the-scenes look at the presidency during Reagan’s gravest political crisis and discloses new details about Vice President George Bush’s role.

Didn’t Know of Deal

Bush has contended that he did not know that the Administration’s secret deal to sell arms to Iran centered on a swap for hostages and involved radical elements in Iran until the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee spelled out those details to him in December, 1986, a month after the news media exposed the scandal.

But “Landslide,” amplifying on news reports that Bush had been repeatedly briefed about the deal before the scandal surfaced, provides a detailed description of a July, 1986, briefing in which an Israeli official told the vice president that the Iranian initiative had turned into a sequence of arms-for-hostage swaps and that it involved “the most radical elements” in Iran’s government.


Bush was briefed at that time, according to the book, because Oliver L. North, then a White House National Security Council aide, viewed the vice president as one of his key supporters and wanted him to promote more arms deals with Iran.

“Bush . . . had a chance to intervene at that point in the arms-for-hostage deal--either to urge that the deals go on or to raise questions and urge that Reagan reconsider what his aides were leading him into,” wrote Mayer and McManus. “Yet he did nothing.”

“Landslide” reports that Baker, on the weekend before becoming chief of staff early in 1987, sent longtime aides Cannon and Thomas Griscom into the White House to look into reports of internal disorder in the wake of the Iran-Contra scandal.

‘No Order in the Place’

Cannon and Griscom were shocked by what they found. “Chaos,” Cannon reported in his memo to Baker. “There was no order in the place. The staff system had just broken down. It had just evaporated.”

Even more chilling, Cannon told Mayer and McManus, was the portrait that White House aides drew of Reagan himself: “They told stories about how inattentive and inept the President was. He was lazy; he wasn’t interested in the job. They said he wouldn’t read the papers they gave him--even short position papers and documents. They said he wouldn’t come over to work--all he wanted to do was to watch movies and television at the residence.”

Cannon told The Times that he interviewed 15 to 20 White House officials, including senior aides, and “the overwhelming majority” painted that portrait of Reagan.


The portrait was so deeply disturbing to Cannon, who had served as an aide to Vice President Nelson A. Rockefeller and as domestic policy adviser to President Gerald R. Ford, that he began his memo to the incoming chief of staff with this startling recommendation:

“1. Consider the possibility that section four of the 25th Amendment might be applied.” The amendment, added to the Constitution in 1967, provides that the President may be removed if the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet declare him “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”

Didn’t Dismiss Idea

According to “Landslide,” Baker was skeptical but did not dismiss the idea. “It doesn’t sound like the Ronald Reagan I just saw, but we’ll see tomorrow,” he told his aides.

They decided to observe the President first-hand before making any decision. At a meeting in the White House on March 2, Baker, Cannon, Griscom and Baker aide A. B. Culvahouse bracketed Reagan at the Cabinet table so they could watch his every move. To Cannon’s surprise, Reagan seemed attentive and alert, charming and glib--the same Ronald Reagan he had known for years.