U.S. Military Aid to El Salvador
In your editorial describing Gen. Maxwell Thurman’s congressional testimony on the Salvadoran war (“The General Lays It on the Line,” Feb. 12), one sentence jumps out as absolutely absurd. After citing military assessments that, despite massive U.S. military aid, the Salvadoran war is at a stalemate and cannot be won, you conclude: “That’s why, when Congress votes to renew that aid--as it is likely to do very soon--it must add conditions . . . to let Cristiani negotiate peace.” Can someone please explain how renewing military aid leads to peace?
Ten years ago, Archbishop Oscar Romero wrote to President Carter pleading not to send military aid to his country. His letter was ignored. In 10 years this country has sent $4 billion and what has it bought? A stalemated war. Romero’s assassination. Continued military attacks on civilians. Generals beyond the control of civilian and judicial authority. More dead priests.
If President Bush wants to strengthen the hand of his friend Cristiani, the best way is to cut off military aid and to place strict conditions on other aid. I bet I’m not the only one who can think of better uses for $1 million per day right here in Los Angeles. Let the Salvadoran generals find someone else to buy their bullets and bombs.
CHRISTINE BERARDO
Studio City
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
