Advertisement

PRO FOOTBALL : Courage Not Walker’s Problem

Share

Herschel Walker, the 225-pound sprinter who has been turned into a jogger by the Minnesota Vikings, continues to be the most misunderstood football player of our time.

The charge that Walker lacks courage was brought into the open on national television Sunday by NBC announcer O.J. Simpson.

It is a preposterous charge. The truth is that Walker has all the courage that Simpson ever showed in his NFL career. And to allege otherwise is to slander a veteran athlete irresponsibly.

Advertisement

Walker’s problem is his style, or lack of style, as a ballcarrier.

He could be an asset to any coach who knows how to use Walker’s assets: his great speed and his aptitude for catching the ball. But as a conventional running back--on slashes or sweeps or when cutting in a broken field--he never has been more than ordinary.

Except for his extraordinary speed and sure hands, Walker, to give him the best of it, was no better than mediocre on conventional offensive plays at Georgia, or at Dallas, or in the USFL or anywhere else he has played football.

Always faster than any defensive player on the field, he has often gained a lot of yards, although, to this day, he doesn’t know how to cut, change pace, hit a hole or attack a defensive player.

In short, he isn’t an instinctive football player. Thus, when confronted by a defender dead ahead, Walker doesn’t know what to do. And his indecision in head-to-head confrontations makes him appear to be flying a white flag.

The appearance is a lie. Nobody catches passes in a crowd more courageously than Walker. And no ballcarrier has ever carried more tacklers on his back, play after play, while struggling on.

Virtually defenseless because of his style, Walker has probably taken more shots than any other active NFL player and has always come back for more.

Simpson, one of the best running backs of all time, should know all that. His assault on Walker was shocking and embarrassing.

Advertisement

A continuing NFL irony is the Washington Redskins’ inability to run the ball for significant yardage with one of the best-designed ground attacks in the game.

The blockers in the Redskins’ one-back offense often push the defense two or three yards off the line--giving their runners two or three free yards at a time--but the Redskins haven’t had a consistently productive ground gainer since John Riggins retired in 1985.

Walker is the kind of athlete who would operate deftly in the Redskin system, which Coach Joe Gibbs has used to win two Super Bowls. Empowered to hit the hole at top speed, Walker would have five yards instantly. And occasionally he would pop it and take off.

Gibbs’ offense is entirely different from Minnesota’s. Based on trap blocking, the Viking system handicaps rather than assists Walker.

First, he doesn’t read traps instinctively. Second, his speed is wasted while he waits for the slow-developing Viking offense to uncoil.

Used properly, Walker would be a potent, productive running back in the NFL. He has the speed to be a big ground gainer for the Redskins, Rams and others. His abilities are not only squandered in Minneapolis, he must also endure insults.

Advertisement

Mike Singletary, the Chicago Bears’ all-pro linebacker, was saying the other day that in pro football, turnovers are overrated.

That will not sit well with the coaches who blame losses on fumbles and interceptions instead of, for example, on coaching mistakes, but it’s a view that Singletary has held since his days at Baylor.

The Bears, who have started 5-1 this fall, finished 6-10 last season under the same coach, Mike Ditka, because “we got away from the basics,” Singletary told Chicago Tribune writer Bob Sakamoto.

“I got in an argument with four or five of the guys on defense last year,” Singletary said. “They said it wasn’t important to be ranked No. 1 on defense if we still kept getting turnovers.

“Even Coach Ditka said as long as we kept getting turnovers, it was OK.

“That’s not the way you play defense. Turnovers are a byproduct of good defense. Once you rely on turnovers to win games and don’t get them, you’re in bad shape.

“We had guys going for the ball and not the body (last year). Hey, just be the No. 1 defense, and the turnovers will take care of themselves.”

Advertisement

Last August, AFC West coaches ranked the Raiders and San Diego Chargers about even with the Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs and Seattle Seahawks in one of pro football’s strongest divisions.

Everything depended, the coaches said, on whether there would be an improvement in any of the division’s four shaky quarterback situations. If not, they said, the AFC West’s only established quarterback, John Elway of Denver, could be expected to maintain the Broncos’ edge.

After the first seven of the season’s 17 weeks, it seems clear that there has been a conspicuous improvement at quarterback in only one of the division’s five cities, Los Angeles. And it follows that the Raiders are out in front in large part because of Jay Schroeder.

Otherwise, there isn’t much to choose from. For example, take the Raider-Charger game Sunday. Both defenses were effective. There were blue-chip receivers on both sides. And both clubs ran the ball smartly. It can’t be said that Marcus Allen and Bo Jackson outran Marion Butts and Rod Bernstine.

The difference was that Schroeder outplayed Billy Joe Tolliver by an immense margin.

As the division heads into its bye week, Schroeder is the All-AFC West quarterback, for which there may be a dual explanation: the faith that owner Al Davis had in him and the refinements by quarterback coach Mike White.

The run-and-shoot offense is still making progress in Houston, where, for the first time, it is being operated by good football players--among them quarterback Warren Moon and four above-average wide receivers.

Advertisement

At Detroit, the run-and-shoot Lions don’t have that kind of talent. And previously, the system was mostly used by school teams.

Thus, the Oilers, with Moon in the huddle and Coach Jack Pardee on the bench, have been elected to determine whether the run and shoot is viable on the professional level. And so far they have shown that it is.

They have led the AFC in offense all year. And after surviving a rash of fumbles and dropped passes earlier, they have won their last two games to get into contention in the AFC Central.

Houston’s opponents have been impressed.

“The Oilers can play football with the best of them,” San Francisco quarterback Joe Montana announced after the 49ers won earlier this month, 24-21, on a fluke Houston error--an inopportune timeout that deprived the Oilers of a fumble recovery late in the fourth quarter.

Commenting on the peculiar power of the run and shoot in San Diego’s loss to Houston, 17-7, Charger linebacker Leslie O’Neal said: “It was really frustrating. We’d rush the passer hard, but they’d throw a little pass and pick up yards.”

Moon’s arm has been doing most of the damage to Houston opponents. The Oilers’ problem has been at running back, where they can’t get untracked with either Lorenzo White or Allen Pinkett after dealing away both Alonzo Highsmith and Mike Rozier--neither of whom has done much since.

Advertisement

Remarking on the Oilers’ wealth of talent in recent years, most NFL critics have mentioned their backs first--but it seems obvious that none of the club’s famous top four was as special as advertised in the Heisman voting.

Most opponents have calculated for some time that there’s something wrong in the Houston backfield. Four pretty good young backs shouldn’t all go bad.

To make a real move in the run and shoot, Pardee will have to improve his backfield. The draw play is open half the time in that system, but to keep Moon from being overwhelmed, somebody will have to run it.

Advertisement