Redistricting Compromise

The ad hoc redistricting plan tentatively approved for the Los Angeles Board of Education is unacceptable. I support Councilwoman Joy Picus’ compromise proposal. The Picus proposal would not lose the representation of two San Fernando Valley board members; also, it recognizes the growing Latino population in the East Valley (District 6), thus creating the potential for a third Latino seat within the next 10 years.

The intent of Proposition M was to increase minority access to the Board of Education. The Valley community lives and works together to provide a natural integration. To now break up the San Fernando Valley community, thus reducing the direct representation of two board members, returns us to problems that will certainly be divisive and cause segregation and hostility. That is unthinkable.

There can be no benefit to students if the redistricting process destroys years of progress toward the recognition of our multicultural heritage. My children benefit from a natural learning environment, within public education, that taught them to understand and respect others whose backgrounds were different.

Today, they are young adults who appreciate diversity and what they learned in school and in the homes of their friends. As a result, they are sensitive, proactive young adults who contribute to many communities.

Public education is in a crisis. Why would anyone wish to support the ad hoc map unless it be a direct road map to get to the voucher and to the end of the road for public education?

We cannot let the redistricting process lead us to a rush for the voucher and the end of public education. People, not politics, must be the absolute priority. If we are truly going to rebuild Los Angeles, then the foundation must be educated communities working side by side to help every student succeed.

BARBARA L. PRESTON, Northridge