A Failure of Justice

Superior Court Judge William Peck’s failure to address the existing case law, along with his apparent bias and prejudice, indicate that decisions of litigants are in jeopardy in the present and in the future (“Court Affirms Divorced Mother’s Right to Locate,” July 2). Not everyone can afford to appeal decisions made by Judge Peck; only if the rare case reaches the appellate court is the erroneous decision corrected.

What about tenure of elected officials when the voters never know the real scope of “errors” committed? Errors based on incompetence, prejudice or bias, still remain errors.

SARAH KAIMAN, Camarillo