The President and the Press
I agree with Bernstein that “Something amazing has happened in America this election year: an awakening by the press about America’s leadership.” It was George Bush and his “obtuseness” about America that has prompted an active and critical press because as Bernstein points out for far too long, “the media cowered before (Reagan’s) popularity.” With some exceptions, most of the media had shutdown and we, the people, had been left in ignorance--not exactly in the best position to make informed decisions.
This year is vastly different. From the Ad-Watch columns in The Times to the incisive presidential debate analyses, investigative articles and critical stories about the candidates, we have been able to see behind the facade of image and empty rhetoric, which had tragically become the formula for access to the White House.
As Bernstein concludes, the next President stands forewarned. We want the press to continue to report rigorously and accurately throughout the tenure of the next presidency. The press should never again abrogate the vital role it plays in our society.
IRENE SEGADE, San Diego
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
