Different Views of Molestation Allegations

I am sick of the “experts” telling us parents of chorus members that we are in denial about the charges against Father Coughlin.

In the first place, how can one be “in denial” about something which hasn’t even been proven to be factual?

Psychiatrists seem to think that our devotion to Father Coughlin is the only basis for our outrage. Our trust has blinded us; we can’t believe he is capable of sin.

No, counselors, we’re not naive. We realize that everyone has the potential of wrongdoing. But we are skeptical of those who make allegations about actions that supposedly took place many years ago and that conveniently lack any substantiation.

We are appalled that such accusations are given only a brief two-month investigation by the diocese and that few were even allowed to know of the charges, much less aid in Father Coughlin’s defense. He was summarily accused, judged, and convicted with no due process.

Guilty until proven innocent. That is the essence of this case. Worse, there is no opportunity to try to prove innocence.

Now psychologists counsel us to view this as we would a death; it’s OK to grieve and pray for him, but don’t look back. Carry on.

It’s like working in a business where a co-worker is suddenly fired, but no one knows about it. His office is immediately cleared out during lunch; he simply disappears, and no one is allowed to question it further. Business as usual.

The great lesson we’ve learned is that anyone can make horrible accusations and virtually destroy a life, be it a priest, a teacher, a political figure, perhaps even your life or mine.

It appears that the serious nature of the charges is more important than whether those charges are true.

So, dear psychologists, we’re frustrated with the situation and the system. But we’re not in denial--except to deny any semblance of fairness and justice.

DIANE RODECKER DARNBROUGH

Huntington Beach