Measure Artists by Music, Not Minutiae

We live in a time when a person’s bedroom habits are seen as more important than those in the boardroom. TV and radio talk shows have joined the ranks of the tell-all tabloids, and the news media at-large seem to be steadily pushing the limits on “sensational” journalism.

Because they’re perceived (and admittedly often marketed) as “larger-than-life,” celebrities frequently find that every aspect of their lives is of great interest. Such microscopic examination dwells disproportionately on subjects that bear little relevance to their professional contributions.

This was most recently illustrated by the media blitz involving the personal inclinations and even physical characteristics of pop superstar Michael Jackson. After his recent television interview, the only records that reporters seemed interested in were those from his medical files (Calendar, Feb. 12). And because the media maintain that it is merely giving the public what it wants, this conception imparts a strange declaration regarding the psychological sentiments of this country.

When an artist’s harmless but often conspicuous departures from traditional norms receive more publicity than his accomplishments--in this case, Jackson’s music and message--that cannot be left unaddressed.

The music business is based on the premise that creativity must be cultivated if it is to continue to grow and evolve. As a result, eccentric behaviors sometimes manifest themselves--an offshoot from fertile grounds within entertainment’s boundaries.

Traditionally, artists have always been on the cutting edge of political and social renaissance. Through voices in the music industry, we witness the evolution of our society. Reflecting current attitudes, recording artists mirror such dispositions as love, despair, fear and hope. Although the genres of music in America may sound different, there has always been a unifying force--that of moving ever forward.

The music business produces one of the most eclectic forms known to humanity. American music exemplifies that art and is acknowledged as the world’s leader in that discipline. It is one of the few industries that encourages, rather than penalizes, its constituents for acting independently.

It is not an industry that produces automobile gears or silicon chips. America can do that, and with justifiable pride, but this is a business that harnesses the equally significant artistic forces that also exist.

Whether it’s heavy metal, bluegrass, hard-core rap or fusion jazz, to discourage self-expression demeans the very thing this nation stands for. Motown Records, as do other record labels, has a tradition of developing promising artists--not just from a musical perspective, but as contributing members of our society as well. And because of its pioneering commitment to artistic development, the word Motown has become more than simply the name of a record company. Motown has evolved into an adjective describing a very special sound and philosophy in music.

In spite of sweeping allegations of social irresponsibility, recording artists have always led fights against injustice and rallied in support of those less fortunate. The City of Hope, Grammy in the Schools, MusiCares, the T. J. Martell Foundation, Heal the World, Farm Aid and We Are the World are a few of the numerous organizations either founded by or vigorously supported by members of the entertainment industry.

The music business is filled with people who dedicate their lives to helping others. Their craft has historically been only part of who they are. Recording artists are the voices of the repressed and the champions of the oppressed. They inspire society with their words and rhythms.

Recent examples include the call-to-arms by Rock the Vote and Rap the Vote, two organizations instrumental in mobilizing an entire generation of young voters.

In everyone there exists certain eccentricities that, in part, help define who we are. A personalized coffee cup, a Mickey Mouse watch, a picture on the office wall or a style of dress are all selections we might make in forming our own unique identity. But what’s more important, the Beatles’ hairstyles or their pioneering sounds? Elvis’ gyrating hips or the songs he sang? Stevie Wonder’s blindness or his visionary music?

By focusing on the irrelevant personal idiosyncrasies of individuals who dedicate their lives to the performing arts, one misses the entire point of their existence. Less attention should be paid on petty examination of personal tastes and lifestyles.

The true measure of any person is his or her contribution to society . . . not which side of the bed he or she sleeps on.