Taxes: Proposal Supporting Schools Linked to Property Values, Reader Believes
My wife and I own a two-bedroom house in Santa Monica’s Sunset Park. We pay $4,000 a year in property tax. When we recently refinanced, we found our property had lost $40,000 in value.
The parcel tax proposal put on the ballot by the school board is one tiny part of our tax payments, but it will help keep Santa Monica-Malibu public schools solvent if it passes, so I support it strongly. Our home is our largest investment. And anything that hurts our schools will further hurt our property value.
I am a 60-year-old, church-going, U.S.-born Army veteran who has grown children. I am not a renter. I don’t belong to Santa Monica Renters Rights, a group which a May 15 letter writer contends controls the local school board.
That letter writer doesn’t like the sex-education program in the schools and he doesn’t like SMRR, and that’s fine by me. But that is hardly a reason to cripple school financing by voting out a critical revenue source for the schools. Vote to change the school board if you wish, but support the Santa Monica-Malibu schools’ parcel tax. Don’t make homeowners’ property values a victim of political battles.
CHARLES P. DONALDSON
Santa Monica
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
