Old Enough to Sing the Praises of ‘Toons : Animation: ‘Fantasia’ or Bugs Bunny isn’t just for kids. More than a third of those watching the Cartoon Network are over 18. Some are even renowned academicians.

A world-renowned scholar of T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound writes a book about the guy who created Wile E. Coyote. A cable channel that shows nothing but cartoons says a third of its audience is old enough to vote. Animation cels--the hundreds of individual drawings that make up a six-minute cartoon--sell for hundreds, even thousands of dollars.

Cartoons may have a reputation for being kids’ stuff; in fact, they’re anything but. Just ask Ken Dennison, who regularly sits down in his Bel Air, Md., home to watch episodes of “Jonny Quest” with his 3-year-old son, Drew.

“Jonny Quest was just a good character,” says Dennison, 30, a senior art director for the Baltimore advertising firm of W.B. Doner. “When I was a kid, I just watched it because it was a cartoon and that’s what you did. But now that I’m older, I realize it’s nice fantasy stuff. They’re just good.”

Dennison’s love of Jonny Quest and Scooby Doo has made him a big fan of the Cartoon Network, one of cable’s fastest-growing channels.

“I definitely watch it a lot,” he says. “I probably watch it too much, even more than ESPN.”

The all-animation channel--launched just over two years ago and another piece of the vast media empire lorded over by Ted Turner--is already the fifth-most-popular cable network, according to numbers for the third quarter of 1994. Although the majority of its audience may not be much older than the network itself, better than one-third of those tuning in are 18 or older.

Hard to believe? It shouldn’t be, animation aficionados say. Kids alone have not made “The Simpsons” a cultural touchstone or turned “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” into a box-office blockbuster.

Great cartoons have always appealed to a wide range of ages and tastes. Consider: The winner of a recent poll asking animators to name the greatest cartoon of all time features Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd in a condensed version of a Wagnerian opera--and plenty of adults own $100 laser-disc versions of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” that they wouldn’t let their children anywhere near.

“I think adults respond just as well to color and movement at 35 years old as they do at 8,” says Mike Lazzo, the Cartoon Network’s vice president of programming.

*

Each type of cartoon has its fans. Most popular among adults are cartoons produced by the Warner Bros. studios, mostly during the 1940s and ‘50s and featuring such stalwarts as Porky Pig, Daffy Duck, the Road Runner and that wisecracking epitome of cool, Bugs Bunny. Disney cartoons are slightly less popular, if only because they seem more specifically geared to children’s tastes and don’t wallow in the bad puns and sarcastic asides so prevalent in the Warner’s canon. But plenty of adults would argue that films like “Fantasia” are among the greatest movies Hollywood has ever produced.

The team of William Hanna and Joseph Barbera first brought Tom and Jerry to the screen for MGM, then later went independent with the Flintstones, Yogi Bear and dozens of other characters. Walter Lantz was the creative force behind Woody Woodpecker, and Max Fleisher wielded the pen responsible for Betty Boop and Popeye.

But regardless of who created them, cartoon lovers agree, one maxim is a constant: A good cartoon is good entertainment. It makes you laugh, features appealing characters and holds up under repeated viewings.

“Chuck Jones,” who created Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner, “used to say, ‘I never did them for kids, I did them for myself.’ That’s a very interesting quote,” says Hugh Kenner, a renowned authority on modern Irish and American literature whose latest book, “A Flurry of Drawings,” is a biography and critical assessment of Jones. (A new Road Runner cartoon, “Chariots of Fur,” is playing in movie theaters with “Richie Rich.”)

Count Kenner, 71, a former Johns Hopkins professor now teaching at the University of Georgia, among the true believers. He believes great cartoons--such as those in his extensive video collection--are works of art. His biography of Jones is the third in the University of California Press’ “Portraits of American Genius” series.

One of his favorites is “What’s Opera, Doc?,” the animated version of Wagner’s Ring trilogy that Jones created in 1957. Its artistry, Kenner suggests, lies not simply in its artwork or dialogue, but in the way it transcends two different worlds. Although the music is Wagner’s, the characters are definitely Looney Tunes.

“If you close your eyes, you’re hearing the real thing,” Kenner said, speaking by phone from his home in Athens, Ga. “If you open your eyes, you’re seeing Elmer Fudd trying to kill a rabbit.”

For Dennison, the very unreality of cartoons is their greatest asset.

“It’s that leap from reality,” he says. “Immediately, you suspend belief and you just sit there and watch it and enjoy it. You don’t analyze it.”

Many film critics would agree. In fact, several have theorized that Warner Bros. cartoons especially are successors to the slapstick comedies so popular in the days of the silents--and also may explain why that sort of broad comedy has largely disappeared from the movies. Charlie Chaplin, they note, may have taken a great pratfall, but even his best couldn’t match the sight of Wile E. Coyote plummeting off a cliff.

Sean Murphy, a film editor and writer who lives in Bel Air, Md., favors the Disney animated features such as “Snow White,” “Pinocchio” and the more recent “The Little Mermaid” and “The Lion King.”

“They have a sense of innocent romanticism that you don’t find in live-action features,” says Murphy, 34. His favorite is “Beauty and the Beast.” “It’s exceptionally well done,” he says. “It’s a classic tale that can always endure one more telling.”

Kenner, for one, finds cartoons are better when they avoid humans altogether--one reason he prefers Warner Bros. to Disney. “The problem with ‘Snow White’ is the prince,” he explains. “In Warner Bros., you don’t get representations of humans. I think they’re better for that reason. There’s no confusion about what they’re trying to achieve.”

But for many adults, trying to analyze why they like cartoons--judging their artistry, looking for levels of meaning--takes all the fun out of it. For them, cartoons are simply fun, and have been since they were kids. Isn’t that enough?

“My generation grew up sitting in front of that cathode-ray tube every morning,” says the Cartoon Network’s Lazzo. “I don’t think (watching cartoons) is a reluctance to let go or a nod to immaturity. I just think it’s something that viewers of a certain age are comfortable with.

“To a great degree,” he adds, “these characters became my generation’s John Wayne.”