Rampart Probe
Re “Rampart Probe May Now Affect Over 3,000 Cases,” Dec. 15:
I think that, rather than using taxpayers’ money to review numerous cases, the district attorney’s office should only review additional cases based on requests from convicted felons. If a person behind bars feels that he was wrongfully convicted as a result of testimony by Rampart’s officers, then the case should be reviewed. This would save the taxpayers money.
Instead of helping Chief Bernard Parks to get rid of officers who do not “deserve to wear the badge,” I think that the goals and objectives should be to examine the current LAPD policy and procedures and make and/or implement timely changes to prevent future police brutality and/or cover-ups.
BARBARA HOBBS
Gardena
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
