LAUSD Grades
* Re “L.A. Unified to Use Numbers for Grading in Elementary Schools,” Oct. 6: Can someone explain how switching from a five-part alphabetic grading system to a four-part numeric system is a “more precise gauge of academic progress”?
With that kind of logic, they should switch to a two-part pass-fail grade, or even to no grade at all, which would be the ultimate mark of academic achievement. The administration members who put forth this new policy get a “1--not proficient” on this one.
KENNETH H. GOLDMAN
La Crescenta
* In your article, a school district official is quoted as saying, “With a four-point scale, either they do or they don’t. It’s much more precise.”
But we are also told that a grade of 2 means “partially proficient,” or partly meeting the standards. If one is partly proficient, one is also partly not proficient; kids who get grades of 2 sometimes meet the standards and sometimes do not. Or, to put it another way, “either they do or they don’t.”
Am I missing something?
KATHARINA SMITH
Canoga Park
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
