GAO Report Warns of Flaws in National Missile Defense System

A new report to Congress warns that the Clinton administration’s plan for a national missile defense system is based on uncertain assessments of the potential threats and is vulnerable to delays and escalating costs.

The General Accounting Office, in a report that circulated on Capitol Hill this week but has yet to be made public, also concluded that it will be difficult to know whether the missile shield will function properly during an attack because of strict limitations on the Pentagon’s ability to test the system of powerful targeting radars, interceptor missiles and high-speed computers.

“The GAO report raises serious concerns,” said Sen. Daniel K. Akaka (D-Hawaii), who requested the report. “As a longtime supporter of national missile defense, I believe that the increase in performance risks because of flight-test restrictions and uncertainties regarding the nature of the threat need to be addressed sooner rather than later in the testing phase.”

Under a schedule pressed by Republican leaders in Congress, the Pentagon hopes to have 100 interceptor missiles based in Alaska by 2007 with the first 20 ready to fire by 2005. The Pentagon concurred with all of the GAO’s findings and has often stated that the development plan is highly accelerated and thus highly risky.

As it proceeds on an emergency basis to defend against potential threats by so-called rogue nations like North Korea and Iran, the Pentagon has said the deadlines require testing and refining the system even as it is being built.

The next evaluation of those capabilities will come after a July 7 flight test over the Pacific in which a “kill vehicle” will attempt to find and collide with an incoming warhead high in space.

Questioning the rationale behind the system, the GAO found estimates of the threat posed by rogue nations to be uncertain.