Transfusion Ban Still in Force, Official Says
The Jehovah’s Witnesses will continue to reject members who defy the group’s prohibition on most blood transfusions, an official said.
Spokesman James Pellechia dismissed news reports that the long-standing policy had been reversed as being misleading.
The group acknowledges that it has ended its practice of excommunicating members who receive blood transfusions. But Pellechia said that a Jehovah’s Witness who has a transfusion automatically “revokes his membership.”
“It has the same effect,” said Pellechia.
Why the semantic change? Pellechia said the group is simply stating more accurately that a person who rejects its tenets chooses to leave.
But Raymond Franz, a former Jehovah’s Witness who once served on the group’s Governing Body, believes the Jehovah’s Witness leadership hopes that publicly ending the practice of disfellowshipping will reduce negative perceptions of the group in Europe.
Pellechia notes that for two decades some Jehovah’s Witnesses have believed that the transfusion of fractions derived from major blood components is allowable.
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
