Advertisement

One Man’s Urgent Struggle to Keep L.A. From Demolishing Its Past

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

He was just a carefree kid having fun, back when he scampered along the streets of downtown Los Angeles, sneaking rides on the Bradbury Building’s ornate iron elevators and exploring the fading clapboard neighborhood of Bunker Hill.

There is a sense of urgency when Brady Westwater prowls the city’s streets these days, though. The 53-year-old feels he has plenty to say about the evolution of the city he loves--and not a lot of time in which to say it.

Bulldozers, in fact, were closing in on one of the city’s oldest commercial buildings when Westwater stopped the other day at 1st and Main streets to watch.

Advertisement

Built in 1885, the cast-iron-accented structure bearing the sign Glasser Bros. Pioneer Bail Bondsmen was being torn down to make way for a $171-million regional headquarters for the state Department of Transportation.

“This building was constructed during the last year that L.A. was still a village. The second railroad came to L.A. right after this building was built, sparking a fare war--tickets dropped as low as $1 a head. After that, L.A. had its first great real estate boom and began turning into a real city,” Westwater shouted over the roar of demolition equipment.

“So this is our last link with our pre-city era. They are going to have a plaza here anyway. Why not keep this old building and turn it into something that would draw people, instead of having a dead, empty plaza that at nights and weekends is going to be vacant?”

Westwater is a self-taught historian and urban planner. And over the last decade he has turned into a self-styled conscience of Los Angeles, struggling to protect it from what he views as bad redevelopment and bum raps.

His real name is Ross Shockley. He was born in Silver Lake and spent his boyhood hanging out around his father’s law office at 3rd and Spring streets. He took to using the Westwater name when he was at UCLA studying to be a screenwriter. For years, he made a living writing for Hollywood. More recently, he worked as a Malibu real estate agent until health problems forced him to quit.

He now works out of borrowed Pasadena office space, writing treatises on such Los Angeles planning issues as redevelopment of the Ambassador Hotel site, development of a Little Tokyo gymnasium, redesign of the county art museum and use of the Los Angeles River’s banks.

Advertisement

Dismissed at first by some as a gadfly, he has changed minds with his proposal for a Los Angeles think tank that would unite planners from various governmental agencies with private-sector architects, sociologists, historians, artists and intellectuals. Together, they could take a much-needed big-picture look at what the next L.A. should be like, Westwater said.

“The real problem with Los Angeles, and downtown in particular, is no one talks to each other,” he said. “People work on projects where things a half block away are totally off their radar.”

Westwater’s views on specific projects are well known to those involved in downtown planning. But he is best known as the person who blew the whistle on author Mike Davis’ 1998 book, “Ecology of Fear.” The bestseller was a catalog of natural disasters that seemed to suggest Los Angeles is the world’s most dangerous place to live.

When no one else pointed out that many of the examples of L.A. apocalypse cited by the book were false, Westwater peppered the media with a 23-page retort that prompted a blizzard of newspaper, magazine and Internet stories.

“No one had noticed it was a work of fiction,” riddled not only with errors but “out and out lies,” Westwater said. In subsequent interviews with The Times, Davis admitted mistakes but stood behind the book’s theme.

Westwater’s historical perspectives are shaped in part by a personal library that he estimates once totaled 25,000 books and magazines. Since quitting work, he said, he has begun selling pieces from the storied collection to live on.

Advertisement

There seems to be wide individual support for Westwater’s think-tank proposal among planning experts.

“The idea of circulating ideas in a setting that breaks down the walls that separate agencies and institutions always have is a good one,” said John Peterson, a specialist on downtown issues for the city Community Redevelopment Agency.

“Brady grinds out a report or a memo on one issue or another almost weekly. He kind of comes out of nowhere and presents some dynamic proposal, and everyone blinks and tries to decide what to do with it.”

Councilwoman Jan Perry, who represents much of the downtown area and is one of those who is regularly peppered by Westwater’s e-mails, characterized the think tank as “a great idea.”

But she disputed the contention that downtown planning excludes outside ideas. “I don’t think people are marching in different directions,” she said. “There are a lot of places to go to participate in a public process for design and input.”

Westwater, meanwhile, presses on, walking downtown’s sidewalks by day and cranking out his engagingly written manifestoes at night.

Advertisement

Absent the influence of a think tank, he hopes the papers will influence agencies that are embarking on such projects as the redesign of Grand Avenue to make it more pedestrian-friendly for Disney Hall and the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels.

He must hurry, Westwater concedes, and not just because of the bulldozers that soon will be on the way to rip up pavement. There’s the matter of his declining health--neurological and respiratory problems are slowing him. “How long I have, I don’t know,” he said.

Turning onto Spring Street near his father’s old law office, he spies the Caltrans building that will be replaced with open space when the new transportation headquarters is built.

“This was built in 1939 and is an interesting transitional building,” Westwater said. “The rear is pure Bauhaus, stripped-down modernism. The front side has Art Deco detailing. It adds to the downtown area, but they want to tear it down for a park nobody will use. Why not keep it and make it an L.A. historical museum, and then you’ll have a reason for people to come here nights and weekends?”

Westwater is re-energized now. His voice rises as much with excitement as to be heard over the street noise.

“Here’s a great historic, classically designed building right in the heart of the Civic Center. L.A.’s the only city without a historic museum. It’s an easy walk from here to the historic pueblo. It’s perfect. Why hasn’t somebody connected the dots?”

Advertisement
Advertisement