Advertisement

Taking $5 wine seriously

Share
Times Staff Writer

HERE’S how crazy the wine market has become in Southern California.

A serious Cabernet from Washington state -- the 1997 Staton Hills Late Release from Columbia Valley -- a wine that for years cost $15 a bottle, can now be found for less than a dollar.

And, when we in the Food section included it in a blind tasting of 22 wines selling for less than $5, it finished in first place, far ahead of the pack.

The Staton Hills Cab may be the ultimate symbol of how the worldwide wine glut has lowered prices and raised quality, especially in Southern California, the most competitive wine market in the United States. Vintage wines selling for less than $5 are more in evidence on the shelves of local retailers than ever before. Hi-Time Wine Cellars in Costa Mesa already carries two dozen such wines, and it expects to have more as wine prices continue to drop. The Wine Country in Signal Hill offers eight, and Trader Joe’s stocks no fewer than 170.

Advertisement

While that’s great news for wine lovers, it’s also confusing: You can’t rely on price to tell you everything about the wine anymore. A $5 price tag used to say something about quality (and it usually wasn’t good). Now, even a 99-cent wine can be eminently drinkable, as vintners churn out vintage bottles of everything from old-vines Grenache from Spain, to riserva Chianti from Italy, to single-vineyard California Sauvignon Blanc.

So, how can you tell when a wine will “drink” more expensive than its price?

We talked with vintners who have so much good stuff that they’re bottling the excess under inexpensive secondary labels, with wholesalers who are on to good Spanish reds that can sell for $4.99, with retailers who aggressively play “the spot market” to score great buys.

A respectable appearance

The new cheap wines don’t look like the jug wines that traditionally have inhabited that region of the price scale. They tend to be vintage wines with specific appellations. The Staton Hills Cab is a case in point. In 1999, the Staton Hills winery was bought by California’s Chalone Wine Group, which changed the name of the winery to Sagelands Vineyard, installed a new winemaker and began buying grapes from growers other than those who’d sold to Staton Hills.

Chalone found itself with a backlog of Staton Hills inventory that it needed to sell off. Under ordinary circumstances, the ’97 Cab should have been released in 1999, but the backlog was such, says Tom Selfridge, Chalone Group president and chief executive, “that it took a while to get to the ‘97, frankly.”

The ‘97, which would have sold for $15 under the previous ownership, wasn’t released until last year (ergo the designation “Late Release”), after picking up added character in barrels and tanks while waiting its turn. The winery tasting room priced it at $5 a bottle for case purchase. The 99 Cents Only stores, however, acquired a large supply of it at a far more advantageous price.

Chalone Group will retain the Staton Hill label, but only for wines made from grapes that don’t make the cut for the new, more ambitious Sagelands label. “Any future Staton Hill wines,” Selfridge says, “will probably be under $10 -- but definitely above 99 cents.”

Advertisement

During the economically fecund 1990s, California wine-grape acreage swelled by 72%, from 332,000 acres to 570,000. From 1991 to 2001, shipments by California winemakers increased from 375 million gallons to 449 million, according to the wine industry consulting firm Gomberg, Fredrikson & Associates. During the same period, wine imports to the United States more than doubled, from 60.6 million gallons to 127 million.

Demand, however, has proven less elastic than supply, and a lot of the new excess has found its way into bargain-priced second-label brands by notable producers and into the mixing tanks of bulk producers who bottle it under the labels of in-name-only wineries, or under private labels for mass retailers.

In Southern California, retailers’ playing of the spot market further adds to the supply. “On a day-by-day basis, there are small amounts of wine that fall through the cracks in the system,” says Robert Rogness of retailer Wine Expo in Santa Monica. Distributors sell good wine cheap to make space in the warehouse or to undercut another brand, he says.

In many states, wholesalers and retailers are prohibited by law from selling wine below cost. This is not the case in California, where, Rogness says, “if somebody wants to lose money, he’s not constitutionally prevented from doing so.”

The current vagaries of the industry have produced bargains for retailers who can react quickly. In many cases, wine shops can quickly recoup their expenditures in these transactions via e-mail, which enables them to alert customers to hot deals on limited items.

Still, the $5-and-under category is a minefield for consumers. Separating bargains from deservedly cheap stuff is not exactly a science. In general, wine shops point to Spanish wines as great bargains because of modern production and government subsidization of low-end producers. They recommend reds as generally superior to whites. They suggest wines from narrower appellations over those from such broad appellations as “California.”

Advertisement

The unprecedented bounty of cheap wines in Southern California makes it impossible to do a tasting of them all, or even of a representative sample, given that under-$5 wines vary so wildly in character, origin and quality.

So, we asked eight retailers, large and small, to suggest a few wines that they were proud to have on their shelves for less than $5. Our panel then put them to the test in a blind tasting. We ultimately sampled 25, but eliminated three (one proved to be corked and two turned out to sell at the alpine price of $5.49). They came from California, Washington state, France, Spain, Italy, Australia and Argentina.

Some of the wines are widely available, for a little more or less than $5, depending on where you shop. Others can be found only at a few outlets. Still others, such as private-label wines, are sold exclusively at one retailer -- unless, lurking under a different label unknown to us, they’re available at other places too.

In these chaotic waters, as with many explorers before us, we experienced our share of confounded expectations and pleasant surprises. For instance, the two top-rated California wines bore the broad “California” appellation, and they bested two others that carried the tighter designations “San Luis Obispo County” and “Monterey.”

The tasting bore out the predictions of wine merchants that, at this price level, red wines are better than whites. (“For whites, $5 is tough,” warned Kyle Smith of Woodland Hills Wine Co.) Of the six top-rated wines in the tasting, only one -- ’01 Butterfield Station “California” Chardonnay -- was white. By contrast, four of the eight lowest-rated were white.

Perhaps most unexpected was the performance of Spanish wines. Numerous merchants had sung hymns to the Spanish reds available at low prices. In the tasting, only one Spaniard -- Protocolo 2000 Tierra de Manchuela -- finished in the top six. Two others, Borsao 2001 Campo de Borja and Vina Alarba 2000 Old Vines Grenache, placed far down the list.

Advertisement

But another word of caution. A formal wine tasting is an abstract exercise stripped of all context, especially food. And a wine tastes different when drunk with various foods (not to mention in various company and in various states of mind). The Vina Alarba, for example, had tasted quite good with a plate of fettuccine alla Bolognese a few days before the tasting.

The tasting points up a truth about wine, up and down the price scale: The relationship between a wine’s price and its ability to please a given person isn’t always a direct one.

“The price affixed to a bottle also doesn’t have much to do with how much you’re going to enjoy the wine, or if it’s going to go with your food,” says Randy Kemner, proprietor of the Wine Country. “Wine doesn’t follow the normal rules of price-quality ratio, and it doesn’t follow the corporate demands of consistency and growth. It fluctuates with nature. That’s why poets write about wine and not about vodka. Wine is not consistency. Wine is an adventure.”

Advertisement