Advertisement

Execution of Killer-Rapist Is Delayed

Times Staff Writers

A court-ordered requirement that convicted murderer-rapist Michael Morales’ execution be monitored by an anesthesiologist caused an unexpected delay late Monday, only an hour before his scheduled death by lethal injection.

The execution was delayed because Warden Steven Ornoski decided that he wanted two anesthesiologists to undergo additional training “in order to understand their roles and the expectations,” said prison spokesman Vernell Crittinton.

“The warden is not at a level of comfort at this moment,” said Crittinton, who noted that the death warrant for Morales calls for the execution within 24 hours of 12:01 a.m. Tuesday.

When asked if Morales had been informed of the delay, Crittinton said: “At this point he has not been informed. If we decide that it can’t be done in 24 hours, he will be told.”

Advertisement

Prison spokeswoman Sarah Ludeman said that if the execution did not occur within 24 hours of 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, a judge would have to set another date.

Early Tuesday, defense attorney David Senior said that he had serious concerns that the prison was not adhering to the judge’s order, which vaguely called for prison officials to provide conditions and equipment “normally used in medical settings.”

“We’re expecting an EKG and blood pressure monitors in the room at their disposal,” he said, referring to the anesthesiologists. “Can you imagine an anesthesiologist working in this day and age without those things?”

He said that the defense team had asked the judge for a stay, but that the prison officials opted for a delay for additional training for the doctors.

Advertisement

The anticipated execution at San Quentin State Prison followed a last-minute clemency campaign fraught with controversy and highly unusual legal twists and turns.

Morales, 46, was convicted of the brutal 1981 slaying of Terri Winchell, a 17-year-old Lodi high school senior. He admitted conspiring with his cousin, Rick Ortega, to kill Winchell as payback for her dating Ortega’s bisexual lover. But he said he accepted responsibility for the crime and was deeply remorseful.

He was set to become the 14th man and the first Latino executed by the state of California since capital punishment was reinstated in 1978.

He also was to be the third inmate executed in California in 10 weeks, and the fifth to whom Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has denied clemency since he took office two years ago.

Morales’ defense team had argued that the state’s three-stage lethal injection protocol violated a constitutional ban on “cruel and unusual punishment,” claiming that the initial rounds of sedatives and paralytic agents might mask, rather than prevent, pain from the final heart-stopping chemicals.

After studying the medical logs of executed inmates, U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel agreed that the procedure was prone to error and recommended having a doctor present to make sure Morales was rendered unconscious before the final dose. His ruling applies, however, only to the Morales execution.

Defense attorneys asked the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to stop the execution on the grounds that Fogel’s remedy was untested and had not been subjected to legal, medical or administrative reviews. The altered procedure was also protested by physician groups, including the American Medical Assn., on the grounds that it contradicted a doctor’s Hippocratic oath to prevent harm.

Crittinton cited Fogel’s ruling as the reason for the delay in the execution: “The protocol is relatively new in that this court decision just came down,” he said.

Advertisement

Morales’ petitions to block the execution were rejected by the appeals court over the weekend and by the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday. An unusual second request for clemency, filed just 12 hours before the scheduled execution, was also rejected by the governor.

In the clemency bids rejected by the appeals court, the California Supreme Court and Schwarzenegger, defense lawyers Senior and former Whitewater independent counsel Kenneth Starr argued that the decision to execute Morales was based on false testimony from a jailhouse informant.

Morales’ trial judge, Ventura County Superior Court Judge Charles R. McGrath, came to agree and announced late last month that had he known that the informant -- a star witness for the prosecution -- had lied, he would not have supported a capital murder charge or sentenced Morales to death in 1983.

Legal experts said it was the first time since California reinstated capital punishment that a judge had asked a governor to commute the judge’s own sentence of death to one of life in prison without possibility of parole.

In his second petition to Schwarzenegger, Starr made a point of saying that there was no record of a governor disregarding a sentencing judge’s recommendation for clemency.

The informant, Bruce Samuelson, testified during the trial that Morales had confessed to him in Spanish that he had plotted to kill Winchell. A decade later, however, an investigation by the state attorney general’s office showed that Morales, a fourth-generation Californian, didn’t speak Spanish.

The problems with Samuelson’s testimony created a rallying cry among advocates led by Starr, a constitutional law scholar and dean of the Pepperdine Law School.

Starr was also impressed that Morales had become what Starr described as “a deeply repentant sorrowful Christian who has accepted full responsibility for a terrible crime that will haunt him forever.”

Advertisement

But the defense team’s clemency campaign was complicated by the recent withdrawal of allegedly forged declarations from jurors urging clemency, in part because of the discrepancy in Samuelson’s testimony. The disputed documents were generated by a defense investigator who was recently pulled off the case.

Prosecutors then submitted affidavits from five unnamed jurors indicating that their unanimous decision to convict Morales had little to do with Samuelson’s testimony.

Morales ate a bowl of oatmeal for breakfast Monday, then snacked on canteen items stockpiled in his cell, including Top Ramen soup and candy bars, said Crittinton, the prison spokesman.

Morales then asked prison officials to give what remained of his stockpile to another inmate on death row.

In the afternoon, he met with his legal team for three hours, and spoke to family members by phone. He opted not to have his loved ones or supporters visit, however. “He stated this was easier on his loved ones, and he wanted to be remembered for the good times in the past,” Crittinton said.

In the evening, Crittinton spoke with Morales, who did not sob or appear overcome with emotion, he said. Instead, Morales talked of his friends, supporters and legal team, and said he hoped they would cope well with his death.

About 6 p.m., Morales was moved to a “death watch” cell adjacent to the execution chamber. He did not request a spiritual advisor. He was given a new pair of denim trousers and a blue work shirt to wear.

As officials prepared for the execution, the rest of the prison inmates were restricted to their sleeping areas. Three protesters were arrested outside; officials said they had tried to block the entrance to the prison.

Officials designated 50 witnesses. Among them were five family members including the victim’s brother, Brian Chalk, 34, and 17 media representatives. Morales named two witnesses, but they were not identified, said Elaine Jennings, acting press secretary for the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

The slaying of Terri Winchell on Jan. 8, 1981, was brutal.

The attack began in Ortega’s car when Morales, then 21, tried to strangle Winchell from behind with a belt, which broke. Morales’ roommate, Patricia Felix, later testified that he earlier had rehearsed the strangulation by wrapping his belt around her neck.

A state attorney general’s report said, “She screamed for Ortega to help and attempted to fight off the attack, ripping her own hair out of her scalp in the struggle.”

Morales then beat Winchell on the head with a claw hammer until her face was no longer recognizable. Then he dragged her face-down across a road and into a vineyard, where he raped her.

Morales then stabbed her four times in the heart. Later that night, he spent $11 he found in her purse on beer, wine and cigarettes.

Two days later, Morales was arrested at his home, where police found evidence, including his broken belt stained with Winchell’s blood, hidden under a mattress. They also found the blood-stained hammer in his refrigerator vegetable crisper, and Winchell’s purse and credit card.

In 1983, Morales was found guilty of murder with special circumstances of lying in wait, planning murder in advance and murder by torture.

Over the years, Morales’ attorneys claimed he was high on PCP the night of the killing and that his cousin, who was sentenced to life in prison, masterminded the slaying of the straight-A student who had sung in a church choir, played classical piano and was working part-time at a local restaurant to raise money for college.

But San Joaquin County Deputy Dist. Atty. Charles Schultz dismissed those claims, pointing out that the lying-in-wait charge against Morales was corroborated by two witnesses.

*

For updated information on the execution of Michael Morales, go to latimes.com.


Advertisement