Advertisement

‘Balanced’ art?

Share

TO the Beverly Hills resident who complained about the defense of a non-”balanced” play, I say: If you don’t want to watch a play that offends you, you can always watch “The Phantom of the Opera” (though that play improperly slanders people with facial deformities, so maybe not) [Letters, April 30].

Since political works of art have the intent of swaying popular opinion, the only political works of art that are worth a damn have clear biases. (Remember Steven Spielberg’s mainstream “Munich” received much grief because it was a commentary on the destructive power of murder without distinguishing between those committed by the Palestinians and those committed by the Israelis.)

For the record:

12:00 a.m. May 18, 2006 For The Record
Los Angeles Times Thursday May 18, 2006 Home Edition Main News Part A Page 2 National Desk 0 inches; 27 words Type of Material: Correction
Letter credit: The attribution for a May 7 Sunday Calendar letter written by John R. Singleton of Los Angeles incorrectly said that he was the film director.
For The Record
Los Angeles Times Sunday May 21, 2006 Home Edition Sunday Calendar Part E Page 2 Calendar Desk 0 inches; 25 words Type of Material: Correction
Letter credit: The attribution for a May 7 letter written by John R. Singleton of Los Angeles incorrectly said that he was the film director.

Regardless of one’s biases, criticizing a play based on the writings of pro-Palestinian activist Rachel Corrie is like criticizing “The Adventures of Huck Finn” for not being “fair and balanced” toward the pro-slavery movement.

Advertisement

JOHN R. SINGLETON

Los Angeles

Singleton directed “Boyz N the Hood” and other films.

Advertisement