Panel iffy about deficit report

A proposed final report by President Obama’s deficit commission warned Wednesday of a fiscal “reckoning” unless major sacrifices are made, but may fail to spur lawmakers to action without support from many members of the bipartisan panel in an upcoming vote.

The report, ominously titled “The Moment of Truth,” immediately drew the support of half of the 14 members needed to move it to Congress for consideration. Only one member -- Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) -- said she would vote against it, while most others said they needed additional time to decide.

Members said they thought some of the commission’s work could reach the floor of Congress. “There’s nothing magical about the 14 votes. We must advance the debate,” said Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas).

A final vote Friday will determine whether the recommendations lead to action or collect dust along with countless other blue-ribbon committee reports.


“If we do not act soon to reassure the markets, the risk of a crisis will increase, and the options available to avert or remedy the crisis will both narrow and become more stringent,” states the document by the panel formally known as the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.

The final recommendations are largely the same as an initial plan issued last month: a cap on discretionary spending through 2020, an overhaul of the tax code, and reforms to Social Security that include raising the retirement age. These steps would slash the federal deficit by $828 billion by 2015, and achieve $4 trillion in deficit reduction by 2020.

But some concessions were incorporated to draw greater support among the panel’s 18 members. A proposal to drastically limit the home mortgage interest deduction was eased. On Social Security, the focus of significant criticism weeks ago, the panel proposed a hardship exemption for workers based on factors like the physical demands of labor and lifetime earnings.

Still, the head of the AFL-CIO, the nation’s largest labor union, charged that the panel had essentially told working Americans to “drop dead.”

Members of the commission said there was no way forward without difficult choices. Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) said that raising the retirement age by one year is “hardly radical.”

“They won’t like me for saying it, but what you have suggested ... is acceptable to me,” Durbin said at a meeting of the panel.

But Durbin, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, was not prepared to offer his final assessment. Neither were a majority of the other elected officials on the commission.

Only Sens. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), the chairman and ranking member, respectively, of the Senate Budget Committee, immediately supported the plan.


“We risk the United States becoming a second-rate economic power,” Conrad told reporters after the nearly three-hour session. “That is what is at stake. The economic future of this country is at stake.”

Schakowsky said she rejected the report “for the reasons of equity.”

“We talk about shared sacrifice. I think these numbers indicate that sacrifice, in fact, has not been shared -- that some people have lost and others have significantly gained over the last several years,” she said at the meeting.

Just five “no” votes would be enough to defeat the proposal, which would be nonbinding in any event.


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has pledged to hold a vote if the proposal is approved.

But even if it is not approved by 14 members, some members expressed their commitment to continue negotiating on proposals that could be introduced in the 112th Congress.

“We’ll see what happens on Friday, but I intend to stay at the table,” said Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Los Angeles).

Members expect that the White House and members of Congress will lean heavily on the bipartisan commission’s recommendations, particularly under the divided government that will exist when Republicans assume control of the House of Representatives next year.